六门临床课程形成性评价实践研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中华医学会医学教育分会2010年度医学教育研究课题(2010-20-07)


Research on the practices of formative assessment of six clinical courses
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章抽样南京医科大学六门临床课程成绩,通过SPSS统计软件分析形成性评价?终结性评价?综合性评价成绩的相关性和差异性?结果显示终结性评价具有较高评价效力,无论在综合性评价中占分比例大小,都与综合性评价呈显著正相关;形成性评价需要占有较大分值比例,才与综合性评价显著相关?结果提示,课程学习成绩评价需要调整和明确目标要求,不同的评价方法适用于不同的评价目标要求;不少课程现行的形成性评价方法需要进一步改进?

    Abstract:

    The article analyzed the correlations and differences among formative,summative and comprehensive assessment of six clinical courses with SPSS. The results showed that summative assessment was more effective and had a significant correlation with comprehensive assessment no matter the proportion, and the correlation between formative and comprehensive assessment was related to the big proportion of formative assessment. These results suggested that it was necessary to adjust and clear the goal and requirement of course assessment, different methods of assessment should be applied to different goals and requirements of assessment,and many methods of formative assessment for existing courses should be further improved.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙 敏.六门临床课程形成性评价实践研究[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2012,(2):144~147

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2012-03-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: