文章摘要
赵 静,接雅俐,杜志波.基金资助论文与无基金资助论文被引情况分析:以部分高水平医学期刊为例[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2012,(6):499~501
基金资助论文与无基金资助论文被引情况分析:以部分高水平医学期刊为例
Analysis of differences in citation between funded papers and non-funded papers in some high-level medical journals
投稿时间:2012-11-14  
DOI:10.7655/NYDXBSS20120625
中文关键词: 基金资助  被引频次  被引率
英文关键词: fund  citation frequency  citation rate
基金项目:江苏省科技期刊研究基金项目(JKQJXB023;JKQJXB001)
作者单位
赵 静 江苏省老年医学研究所《实用老年医学》编辑部,江苏 南京 210024 
接雅俐 南京医科大学学报编辑部,江苏 南京 210029 
杜志波 江苏省老年医学研究所《实用老年医学》编辑部,江苏 南京 210024 
摘要点击次数: 835
全文下载次数: 948
中文摘要:
      选择基金资助论文作为高水平论文,对其被引用情况进行分析,同时与无基金资助论文的被引情况进行比较,以探讨二者被引情况存在的差异?结果表明,被引用过的基金资助论文的单篇被引频次并不比无基金资助论文高,而基金资助论文的被引率显著高于无基金资助论文?由此可见,论文的引用率可推广应用于表示期刊的水平?
英文摘要:
      This article chose funded papers as high-level papers,analyzed the citations of these papers,and investigated the differences in citation between funded papers and non-funded papers. The results suggested that there was no difference in citation frequency of single paper between funded papers and non-funded papers,while there was significant difference in citation rate between funded papers and non-funded papers. It could be got that citation rate of papers may be used to reflect the levels of journals.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭