灾难化信念的概念构建及量表初步编制
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金“强迫症患者多模态磁共振特征及不同治疗方法对其影响的研究”(81171277)


Catastrophic belief: conceptual construction and preliminary scale development
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    构建灾难化信念的概念,编制灾难化信念量表。通过文献分析和半结构式访谈确定灾难化信念的概念并获得量表的条目和结构。运用项目分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析考察量表,进行信度、效度检验。灾难化信念量表共包含19个题项,由自我评价、躯体安全、他人评价、财物安全4个因子组成。验证性因素分析所得指标为χ2/df=2.238、比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.925、规范适配指数(NFI)=0.874、拟合优度指数(GFI)=0.894、Tucker?Lewis指数(TLI)=0.904、适配度指数(IFI)=0.926、近似误差均方根(RMSEA)=0.071,量表的内部一致性信度为0.766~0.898、分半信度为0.893、3周后的重测信度为0.870。灾难化信念量表具有良好的心理测量学特性,可作为心理健康评估和预测的工具。

    Abstract:

    The study was to construct a theory of catastrophic belief and establish a catastrophe belief scale. The concept of catastrophic belief was defined and the entries and structures of the scales were designed, based on lots of literatures and semi?structured interviews. The reliability and validity were examined by project analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The catastrophic belief evaluation form consists of 19 items, which are composed of four groups factors: self?evaluation, physical safety, evaluation from others, and property security. The confirmatory factor analysis indicators were:χ2/df=2.238、CFI=0.925、NFI=0.874、GFI=0.894、TLI=0.904、IFI=0.926、RMSEA=0.071, and the internal consistency reliability of the scale was 0.766~0.898, the split?half reliability is 0.893, and the test?retest reliability after three weeks is 0.870. The conclusion is that our catastrophic belief evaluation form has good psychometric properties and can be used as a tool for mental health assessment and prediction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李纹仲,,刘冰妍,,杨 华,,陈图农,,徐 曙.灾难化信念的概念构建及量表初步编制[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2020,(2):134~139

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-11
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-04-30
  • 出版日期: