三孔全胸腔镜技术在再次三尖瓣置换手术中的应用
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学第一附属医院心脏大血管外科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(81974066)


Three ports totally thoracoscopic surgery for tricuspid valve replacement in reoperative cardiac surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨左心瓣膜术后再发三尖瓣重度关闭不全,行全胸腔镜下三尖瓣置换的近期临床疗效,比较与经右胸小切口技术的临床结果。 方法: 2018年 1 月 ~ 2020年 12 月回顾性分析我院50例左心瓣膜术后出现三尖瓣重度关闭不全患者的临床资料。根据手术方式的不同分为行全胸腔镜组(24例)及经右胸小切口组(26例)。对比两组术中升主动脉阻断时间,转机时间,手术时间、术后引流量、术后拔出气管插管时间、术后出院时间,以及术后并发症。结果:全腔镜组无死亡,全腔镜组和小切口组各1例住院30天死亡,两组无统计学差异。全腔镜组体外循环时间较小切口组稍长(113.4±46.5 vs 104.5±36.7min;p>0.05) ,但两组没有统计学差异。全腔镜组在手术时间( 210.3±56.7 vs 236±81.2 min;P=0.032) ,术后 24 h 引流量( 248.5 ± 134.5 vs 316.5±181.2 ml ;P=0.021), 住院时间(9.5± 1.5 vs 11.2 ± 3.7 days; P = 0.044),均显著小于小切口组。术后顺访 1 ~ 36 个月( 11.3 ± 6.7月),全腔镜组术后三尖瓣无瓣周漏及传导阻滞,小切口组1例瓣周漏,术后心功能恢复两组无明显差异。 结论:全胸腔镜下心脏不停跳再次三尖瓣置换近期疗效满意,和小切口三尖瓣置换相比较,具有创伤小,恢复快的特点,是左心瓣膜术后再次三尖瓣置换的重要治疗方式。

    Abstract:

    Objectives: To investigate the safety and feasibility of three ports totally thoracoscopic surgery for tricuspid valve replacement in reoperative cardiac surgery.The clinical results was compared with right mini-thoracotomy. Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2020, 50 patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement with severe tricuspid regurgitation after left-sided valve surgery . Included patients were divided into two groups, totally thoracoscopic surgery (TTS Group, n=24) and right mini-thoracotomy (RMT Group, n=26). Operational data and clinical outcomes were compared between two groups. Results:Compared with RMT,Patients in TTS group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (113.4±46.5 vs 104.5±36.7min), but the difference was not significant. TTS lowered the total operation time( 210.3±56.7 vs 236.5±81.2 min;P=0.032),the volume of 24-hour chest drainage (248.5 ± 134.5 vs 316.5±181.2 ml ;P=0.021)and postoperative hospital stay time (9.5± 1.5 vs 11.2 ± 3.7 days; P = 0.044). No differences were found in postoprative comlications. one in-hospital death in RMT group. Conclusion: TTS is safe and feasible for tricuspid valve replacement in reoperative cardiac surgery. Compared with RMT, it has been associated with less trauma ,faster recovery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-13
  • 最后修改日期:2021-05-27
  • 录用日期:2021-09-28
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: