南京市低收入人群急性脑梗死影响因素研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京市红十字医院神经内科;2.南京医科大学附属脑科医院神经内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

南京市医学科技发展重大项目(编号:ZDX12007);南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目(编号:YKK18270)


Risk factor investigation analysis for acute cerebral infarction of low-income population
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Neurology, Nanjing Red Cross Hospital;2.The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对南京市低收入急性脑梗死(acute cerebral infarction,ACI)人群和对照组非低收入急性脑梗死人群进行临床资料调查的对比分析,探讨低收入人群急性脑梗死危险因素的构成。我们首次关注了心理和社会因素对在两组患者中的区别。方法:纳入研究的低收入急性脑梗死患者(n=300)和非低收入急性脑梗死患者(n=200)共计500例。研究参数包括了基线参数,既往病史、心理和社会因素。计量数据采用t检验,计数数据采用χ2检验,P<0.05认为显著差异。结果:低收入组急性脑梗死患者有显著低于对照组的年龄和体重指数。低收入急性脑梗死患者中同时罹患高血压的比例要显著高于对照组。与对照组患者相比,低收入组患者承受更大的心理压力,较少的社会支持度,严重的焦虑和抑郁,更差的睡眠质量和更低的婚姻幸福指数。结论:综上所述,低收入组急性脑梗死患者与对照组在基线数据、既往病史、心理和社会因素中都有显著区别。而这些因素是否可以作为其危险因素仍需要在大样本量中验证。

    Abstract:

    Objective: The present study was performed to analyze the clinical data on identifying risk factors between the low-income acute cerebral infarction (ACI) and control populations in Nanjing. Our present study focused on the influence of psychological and social factors of patients on ACI in low-income population for the first time. Methods: A total of 500 patients were enrolled in this study, including low-income patients (n=300) and non-low-income patients (n=200). Study parameters included baseline parameters, past medical history, psychological and social factors. The enumeration data was expressed as % and tested by χ2; measurement data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and tested by t-test. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: ACI patients in the low-income group had significantly decreased age and BMI compared with control. The proportion of diabetes and hypertension in low-income ACI patients was significantly high compared with that in non-low-income group. Compared with patients in the control group, patients in the low-income group suffered from greater psychological stress, less social support, severer anxiety and depression, poorer sleep quality and lower marital happiness index. Conclusion: The ACI patients from low-income group was differed with that of control group in terms of baseline data, past medical history, psychological, and social factors. However, whether these factors can be used as risk factors still needs to be verified.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-19
  • 最后修改日期:2022-09-18
  • 录用日期:2022-11-10
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: