文章摘要
唐春平,韩 笑,王俊宏,周宁天.单导联智能心电检测用于心律失常筛查的效果研究[J].南京医科大学学报,2020,(12):1800~1803
单导联智能心电检测用于心律失常筛查的效果研究
Usage of single⁃lead artificial intelligence electrocardiography in arrhythmia diagnosis
投稿时间:2020-09-03  
DOI:10.7655/NYDXBNS20201211
中文关键词: 单导联心电记录仪  人工智能识图  多导联心电记录仪  心律失常
英文关键词: single⁃lead electrocardiography  artificial intelligence  Holter  arrhythmia
基金项目:江苏省卫计委开放课题(x201829);国家自然科学基金面上项目(81570328)
作者单位
唐春平 南京医科大学第一附属医院心血管内科江苏 南京 210029 
韩 笑 南京医科大学第一附属医院心血管内科江苏 南京 210029 
王俊宏 南京医科大学第一附属医院心血管内科江苏 南京 210029 
周宁天 南京医科大学第一附属医院心血管内科江苏 南京 210029 
摘要点击次数: 0
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的:比较单导联人工智能心电检测设备和传统多导联心电检测设备在常见心律失常检测中的效果。方法:随机选取心血管内科门诊及入院心悸患者152例,排除禁忌后按临床检查需要同时佩戴单导联人工智能心电检测仪与传统多导联心电检测仪不少于22 h。结果:两组仪器对总心搏数、平均心率、最小心率、房性早搏、室性早搏、房性心动过速检测数值采用配对t检验,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:单导联人工智能心电检测仪与传统多导联心电检测仪在心电记录及判读方面具有相同效果,且具备低成本、易使用、人工智能读图等优势,对心律失常筛查及诊断具有重要价值。
英文摘要:
      Objective:This study aims to compare the efficiency of ECG diagnosis with single lead artificial intelligence electrocardiography and with traditional Holter. Methods:A total of 152 patients were randomly selected. After elimination of contraindication,they were required to wear single lead artificial intelligent electrocardiograph and traditional multi?lead electrocardiograph for no less than 22 hours according to the clinical examination requirements. Results:There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the total number of cardiac beats,average heart rate,minimum heart rate,atrial premature beats,ventricular premature beats and atrial tachycardia measured by unpaired t test(P > 0.05). Conclusion:Single?lead artificial electrocardiograph has the same effect as traditional multi?lead electrocardiograph in the recording and interpretation of heart rate. Single?lead artificial electrocardiograph has advantages of low lost,easy to use,artificial intelligence and so on,and it has important value for screening and diagnosis of arrhythmia.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器