The Effects of different primers and data analysis methods on real-time PCR
DOI:
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective:To study the effects of different primers and data analysis methods on quantitative real-time PCR. Methods: Four pairs of different primers were designed for target genes CCND1 and C-JUN using Primer Express 2.0 software. These primers were then used for quantitative PCR amplification and the differences in expression levels between paclitaxel sensitive and resistant lung cancer cell lines were calculated using 2(-DeltaDeltaC(T))method,Pfaffl method and the relative standard curve method,respectively. Results:The expression levels obtained from different primers were significantly different (P < 0.05). In the three kinds of calculation methods,Pfaffl method has no significant difference with the relative standard curve method (P > 0.05),however,2(-DeltaDeltaC(T))method has significant differences with other two kinds of methods (P < 0.05). Conclusion:The amplification efficiency of primers have significant impact on quantitative PCR analysis. The Pfaffl analysis method in the evaluation of relative real-time PCR may be more accurate.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

刘正霞,徐 阳,徐进梅,杨明夏,马 磊,朱昌亮.不同引物及数据分析方法对定量PCR结果的影响[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版英文版),2009,29(8):1112-1117.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:February 06,2009
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online:
  • Published:
Article QR Code