Comparison of accuracy of Celite i-STAT® ACT and Medtronic ACT® Ⅱin ACT measurement
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective:To evaluate the difference and correlation of activated clotting time(ACT) measured between Celite i-STAT- Ⅱ and clinical classical measurement method-Medtronic ACT Ⅱ. Methods:Sixty patients underwent elective cardiac surgery. We compared ACT values measured by Medtronic ACT-Ⅱ and Celite i-STAT- Ⅱ. Blood samples were obtained before establishment of extracorporeal circulation,after heparinization and protamine neutralization,respectively,and then measured by the two methods. Linear regression and Pearson correlation analysis were performed to assess the consistency of the two measured data. Bland-Altman plot was performed to evaluate bias. Results:Celite i-STAT-ACT value was 85 to 913 seconds and Medtronic ACT-Ⅱ value was 99 to 980 seconds,R2 = 0.96,regression equation:y = 7.86 + 0.86x,Pearson correlation coefficient:r = 0.98(P < 0.001). ACT value ranged from 480 to 999 seconds and had linear correlation,R2 = 0.65,regression equation:y = 108.82 + 0.72x,Pearson correlation coefficient:r = 0.80(P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plot showed that the results of the two methods had good consistency. Conclusion:In ardiac operation under extracorporeal circulation,ACT values measured by Celite i-STAT- ACT and Medtronic ACT-Ⅱ are acceptable clinically.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

马晓媛,张永强,姜巧巧,郑 宏,王 江. Celite i-STAT® ACT 和Medtronic ACT® Ⅱ测量ACT准确性的比较[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版英文版),2014,(7):986-990.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:December 20,2013
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: July 05,2014
  • Published:
Article QR Code