卫生执法视角下“通报批评”的行政处罚适用:原则阐明与救济构想——基于818例通报批评
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

伦敦大学学院法学院,英国 伦敦 WC1E 6BT

作者简介:

陈奕吉(2002—),女,浙江宁波人,硕士研究生在读,研究方向为实证法学、涉外知识产权。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

DF36

基金项目:


The application of administrative punishment of “informed criticism” from the perspective of health law enforcement: clarification of principles and concept of remedies ——Based on 818 cases of notification of criticisms
Author:
Affiliation:

Faulty of Law,University College London,London WC1E 6BT,UK

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2021 年新《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》将通报批评新增为一般行政处罚种类,自此通报批评在执法中被广泛适用,特别在公共卫生执法领域发挥了巨大作用,完成了立法到实践的转向。通过实证分析公共卫生执法下 818 例通报批评行政处罚发现,其执法运行实效不尽如人意,未达预期的处罚效果,空白缺位的救济措施使其一般化适用陷入不孚众望的尴尬境地。 溯其原因,亟待规范的不恰当适用造成了对比例原则等诸多法原则的严重破坏。为实现通报批评的正确适用,需解构其处罚效果以进行执法路径优化,并参照比较法提出救济要求,引入民法中的“更正权”和“回应权”构建救济制度。

    Abstract:

    The new Law of the People’s Republic of China on Administrative Penalty in 2021 added informed criticism as a new type of general administrative penalty. Since the implementation of the new law in July 2021,informed criticism has been widely applied in law enforcement,especially in the field of public health law enforcement,playing a great role and completing the transition from legislation to practice. However, through empirical analysis of 818 cases of informed criticism of administrative penalties under public health law enforcement,we discovered that the operational effectiveness of informed criticism in law enforcement is unsatisfactory. The failure to meet the expected penalty effect,and the absence of remedies have put the general application in an unpopular and awkward situation. Tracing back the causes, the inappropriate application of the much - needed norms has caused severe damage to the principle of proportionality and other law principles. In order to achieve the proper application of informed criticism,it is necessary to deconstruct the effect of its punishment to optimize the path of law enforcement and to introduce the“right of correction” and“right of response”in civil law to set up a relief system with regarding comparative law to provide relief requirements.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈奕吉.卫生执法视角下“通报批评”的行政处罚适用:原则阐明与救济构想——基于818例通报批评[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2024,(5):498~505

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-24
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-10-31
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码