医院口腔健康教育材料的接触—理解—应用效能评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.安徽医科大学创新创业学院,2.公共健康社会治理安徽省哲学社会科学重点实验室,3.医学人文学院,4.文献信息研究所,安徽 合肥 230032 ;5.山东大学第一临床医学院,山东 济南 250012

作者简介:

储伊力(1990—),女,安徽安庆人,博士,校聘副教授,研究方向为健康信息评价、健康信息服务

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R780.1

基金项目:

安徽省高等学校科学研究项目“安徽省老年人健康信息文本可读性评估模型研究”(2022AH050636);安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题“健康中国战略下医学图书馆老年健康科普服务研究”(2022KY007);安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目“老年人健康信息文本适用性研究”(AHSKQ2022D141)


Evaluation of the access-understanding-application effectiveness of hospital oral health education materials
Author:
Affiliation:

1. College of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2. Key Laboratory of Public Health Social Governance, Philosophy, and Social Sciences of Anhui Province, 3. School of Humanistic Medicine, 4. Institute of Documentation and Information, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032 ; 5. First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University, Jinan 250012 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究获取来自安徽省合肥市多家医院的161篇口腔健康教育平面材料,分别以DISCERN工具、中文可读性模型和PEMAT-P工具对这些材料的质量、可读性、可理解性和可实践性进行评价,并比较分析公立医院和民营医院健康教育材料的异同。结果显示,整体而言,医院口腔健康教育材料的综合质量处于中等水平,语言难度相当于初中一年级水平,其可理解性和可实践性得分均低于推荐阈值。民营医院材料在总体评分上略高于公立医院,呈现出更好的可读性与用户导向性;公立医院材料则在内容的客观性与信息平衡性方面表现更佳。

    Abstract:

    This study collected a total of 161 printable oral health education materials from multiple hospitals in Hefei, Anhui Province. DISCERN, a Chinese readability model and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P), were used to assess the overall quality, readability, understandability, and actionability of these materials. Differences and similarities of health education materials between public and private hospitals were also compared. Based on mean scores, the overall quality of hospital oral health education materials was moderate, with a language difficulty equivalent to approximately the first year of junior high school. The scores of understandability and actionability were both below the recommended threshold. Compared across different hospital types, materials from private hospitals scored slightly higher overall and demonstrated better readability and user orientation, whereas materials from public hospitals performed better in terms of content objectivity and balance of information.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

储伊力,杨顺利,王艳,龙子怡.医院口腔健康教育材料的接触—理解—应用效能评价[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2026,26(4):412~420

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-23
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-31
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭