医学学科核心素养指标体系构建研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1. 南京医科大学医学人文研究院 ;2. 医学教育研究所, 江苏 南京 211166

作者简介:

张玥(1983—),女,江苏扬州人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为医学教育、医学人文,通信作者,zhangyue2013@njmu.edu.cn。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G642.0

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金高校思想政治理论课研究专项“医学院校课程思政与思政课程协同育人模式创新及成效评价研究”(24VSZ133);江苏省社会科学基金“新医科背景下医学拔尖创新人才学科核心素养的培养与构建”(23JYD009);中国高等教育学会高等教育科学研究规划重点课题“基于中国实践的高校哲学社会科学多维科研评价体系研究”(25SK0201)


The construction of a core competency indicator system for medical disciplines
Author:
Affiliation:

1. Institute of Medical Humanities ;2. Institute of Medical Education, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究针对新医科建设对医学人才培养的新要求,旨在构建一套体现中国特色、融合医学伦理的医学学科核心素养指标体系,为医学教育改革提供理论依据。通过国际比较与政策文本分析提取素养要素;运用凝聚子群分析法聚类形成“知、情、意”三维度雏形;采用德尔菲法进行三轮专家咨询(15名专家),对指标进行筛选、修正与共识检验。结果构建了包含3个一级维度(知识获取、价值认同、思维与行动)、18个二级指标的医学学科核心素养指标体系,其中“医学人文素养”“医者道德观”“医学伦理知识”等伦理指标的重要性获得专家高度共识。三轮咨询专家权威系数分别为0.865、0.875、0.859,协调系数显著,最终指标变异系数均小于0.25,体系具有良好的科学性与共识度。研究指出,未来医学教育应以“医学是人学”为统领,以伦理自觉与人文关怀为主线,实现学科知识与生活实践的双向融合。

    Abstract:

    In response to the new requirements for talent cultivation under the New Medical Education initiative, this study aims to construct a disciplinary core competency indicator system for medical education that reflects Chinese characteristics and integrates medical ethics, thereby providing a theoretical basis for medical education reform. Initial competency elements were identified through international comparisons and policy text analysis. The cohesive subgroup method was employed to cluster these elements into a preliminary three-dimensional framework of knowledge, attitude, and volition. Three rounds of Delphi expert consultation involving 15 experts were conducted to screen, revise, and validate the consensus on the indicators. The final system comprises three primary dimensions (Knowledge Acquisition, Value Identification, Thinking and Action) and 18 secondary indicators. Ethics-related indicators, including “Medical Humanistic Literacy” “Medical Ethics Awareness” and “Medical Ethical Knowledge”, achieved a high level of expert consensus on their importance. The expert authority coefficients for the three consultation rounds were 0.865, 0.875 and 0.859, respectively, with statistically significant coordination coefficients. The coefficients of variation for all final indicators were below 0.25, indicating strong scientific validity and expert consensus. The study suggests that future medical education should be guided by the principle that “Medicine is Humanism” with ethical consciousness and humanistic care as central themes aiming to achieve the mutual integration of disciplinary knowledge and life practice.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张玥,施浩,邵建文,王健男.医学学科核心素养指标体系构建研究[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2026,26(4):426~431

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-17
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-31
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭