基于层次分析法的临床医学专业课教师课程思政能力评价指标体系构建
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1. 南京医科大学第二附属医院党委办公室, 江苏 南京 210011 ; 2. 复旦大学公共卫生学院, 上海 200032

作者简介:

朱跃州(1985—),男,江苏连云港人,副研究员,研究方向为卫生管理;

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G641

基金项目:

江苏省医院协会医院管理创新研究课题(JSYGY-3-2023-571)


Construction of the evaluation index system for the course-based ideological and political education competencies among clinical medicine instructors based on the analytic hierarchy process
Author:
Affiliation:

1. Office of the CPC, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011 ; 2. School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    当前临床医学专业课课程思政建设是医学教育立德树人的关键,但缺乏科学系统的教师能力评价体系,制约了教学质量的提升,研究选取了20名相关领域专家,采用德尔菲法开展两轮函询,结合层次分析法确定指标权重,旨在构建科学合理的评价指标体系,提升教师课程思政教学能力。结果显示,两轮专家积极系数分别为100%和95%,权威系数为0.89和0.90,最终构建了包含4个一级指标、9个二级指标、28个三级指标的体系,"教学效果"权重最高(0.2546)。该体系兼具科学性与实用性,可为临床医学教师课程思政能力评价提供理论与实践支撑。

    Abstract:

    Curriculum ideological and political education (CIP) is an essential measure to enhance the effectiveness of talent cultivation in higher education. Since its introduction as a new concept, it has received considerable scholarly attention. To develop a scientifically grounded evaluation index system for CIP implementation by clinical medicine course instructors and to enhance their CIP teaching capabilities, this study conducted a literature review and two rounds of Delphi consultations with 20 experts. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to determine the weight of each indicator. The positive coefficient of expert participation in the two rounds of consultation was 100% and 95%, with expert authority coefficients of 0.89 and 0.90, respectively. The evaluation index system for the CIP teaching ability of clinical medicine instructors comprises 4 primary indicators (teacher competence, teaching process, teaching content, and teaching outcomes), 9 secondary indicators, and 28 tertiary indicators, with teaching effectiveness receiving the highest weight of 0.254 6. The resulting evaluation index system for clinical medicine instructors' CIP teaching ability demonstrates strong scientific validity and practical applicability, providing strong theoretical and practical support for evaluating CIP teaching capabilities of clinical medicine instructors.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱跃州,孙艺,蒋威涵,顾民,汪洁云.基于层次分析法的临床医学专业课教师课程思政能力评价指标体系构建[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2026,26(5):562~568

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-11-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭