某三级医院实施临床路径管理的效果评价
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

淮安市第一人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Effect evaluation of clinical pathways management
Author:
Affiliation:

Huai’an First People’s Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【】 目的 对我院13个临床路径病种的实施效果进行总结和评价。 方法 选取2012年3月至2014年2月实施临床路径及2009年10月至2011年9月未实施临床路径的膀胱肿瘤等13个病种分别作为实验组和对照组,以术前住院日、住院天数、住院费用及住院药费等作为评价指标,进行Pearson相关性分析及Hotelling T2或t检验。 结果 多数病种的评价指标间均具有显著的正相关性。在此基础上,差异性检验同样表明多数病种实施临床路径后有着显著的效果(P<0.05)。 结论 具备科学合理的规范并严格地按此实施的临床路径能够有效地降低住院日、提高医疗效率、减少患者住院费用、降低医疗成本。

    Abstract:

    【】 Objective To evaluation of clinical pathway applied to 13 diseases in our hospital. Methods Selected the implementation of clinical pathway from 2012 March to 2014 February and unimplementation from 2009 October to 2011 September of bladder tumor in 13 cases respectively as the experimental group and control group. Set the preoperative hospital days, hospital stays, hospitalization expenses and medicine expenses as the assessment indexs by using Pearson correlation analysis and Hotelling T2 or t test. Results Evaluation indexs of most diseases had a significant positive correlation. On this basis, the difference test also showed that most diseases after the implementation of clinical pathway had significant effect. Conclusion The clinical pathway which had a scientific and reasonable standard and strictly according to the implementation could effectively reduce the hospitalization days, improve medical efficiency, and reduce the cost of hospitalization of patients and the medical cost.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-14
  • 最后修改日期:2014-09-15
  • 录用日期:2014-10-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码