Objective: To compare the differences in HTA knowledge translation between different types of research units and provide some scientific evidences to expand HTA impact in the process of policy-making. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire survey was implemented to domestic HTA researchers. Likert scores were applied to describe the situation of HTA knowledge translation. Rank-sum test was conduct to compare the differences in HTA knowledge translation between different types of research units. Results: While the differences in research utilization were not statistical significant, some significant differences were detected in the aspects of organizational KT support, research uptake process, cognition of KT, output forms of research outcomes, quality of HTA research. Conclusion: It is recommended to establish the KT support mechanism for HTA research outcomes, strengthen the collaborations and communications between HTA researchers and policy-makers, promote their cognition of HTA knowledge translation in the process of decision-making, and adopt various output forms of research outcomes more appropriately and effectively.