objective: to explore the technique of communication between doctors and patients with BPH and undergoing TURP, to reduce the doctor-patient contradiction, and to improve satisfaction of the patients.Methods: From January 2014 to 2015 September, a total of 210 patients undergoing TURP,ranged in age from 54 to 87, were enrolled in this prospective study.Participants were randomly divided into 2 groups. as study group, group 1 patients received a novel scientific communication method by the application of enhanced Calgary-Cambridge Guide extended communication frame, doctor-patient communication decision tree model based on Parto principle,and doctor-nurse-patient tripartite communication,and as control group,group 2 patients received a traditional communication.Complication and satisfaction of all patients were observed and compared between 2 groups by follow-up.Results:No significant difference in the incidence rate of complication of 2 groups patients was showed by Chi-square test(P=0.895).However, there was significant difference in the occurrence rate of doctor-patient contradiction between 2 groups(P=0.015),and satisfaction of patients in study group was superior than those in control group(P<0.001). Such factors as degree of education, medical insurance and economic income of patients did not showed obvious correlation with doctor-patient contradiction.Conclusion:Scientific,timely and effective communication between doctors and patients could reduce the contradiction resulted from early complication after TURP and improve satisfaction of patients.