临床医学非主干课程考评方法改革的探索
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京医科大学第二临床医学院;2.南京医科大学第二临床医学院第二附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

南京医科大学“十二五”教育研究课题,一般项目,“临床医学专业非主干课程的教学与评价方式研究”。


The reform on the clinical non-major course evaluation method
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The Second Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University;2.The Second Clinical School The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 通过改革临床医学专业本科生四年级非主干课程的考试评价模式,来探索对其临床主干课程教学效果甚至临床技能学习效果等方面的影响。 方法 对在南京医科大学E学院学习的临床医学专业四年级学生的非主干课程实施教学考评方法改革,通过对师生问卷调查,比较改革前后与其它班级主干课程成绩和执业医师资格考试成绩。 结果 调查数据显示:对本次非主干课程考试方式改革的评价为“好”的学生占85.80%,95.27%的学生认为改革能节省时间有助于主干课程学习。对本次非主干课程考试方式改革的评价为“好”的老师占74.29%,对于非主干课程这种教学方法能否满足本科阶段的学习要求,有94.28%教师认为能和基本可以。学习成绩的统计分析显示:未采取改革之前,我院班级成绩排名的改变不明显。采取改革后的班级成绩排名上升。 结论 我院实行的非主干课程考评方法改革能提升班级成绩,可以让教师和学生能更加有效地教与学,将学生培养成为合格的医学人才。

    Abstract:

    Objective: Objective To explore the influence on the teaching effect of clinical main courses and even the learning effect of clinical skills by reforming the examination evaluation mode of non-main courses for the undergraduate students of clinical medicine in the fourth grade. Methods: The teaching and evaluation methods of the fourth year students in clinical medicine major in E college of Nanjing Medical University were reformed, through the questionnaire survey of the teachers and students, we compared the main course scores of other classes and the qualification examination for medical practitioners before and after the reform. Results: The questionnaire data showed that 85.80% of the students rated as "good" for the reform of non-main course examination and 95.27% thought the reform would save time and help them learn the main courses better.74.29% of the teachers rated as "good" for the reform of exam methods of non-main courses, and 94.28% thought that the teaching method of non-main courses could meet the learning requirements of undergraduate courses. The statistical analysis of academic performance shows that before the reform was adopted, there was no significant change in the scores ranking of the classes in our school. The scores of class rankings are improved after the reform. Conclusion: The reform of non-main course evaluation method implemented in our hospital can improve the score, enable the teachers and students to teach and learn more effectively, and the students are trained to become qualified medical talents.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-05
  • 最后修改日期:2018-12-07
  • 录用日期:2019-03-14
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码