浙沪传染病信息有效利用程度比较及对传染病防控影响研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.安徽医科大学卫生管理学院;2.复旦大学卫生发展战略研究中心;3.重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院;4.山东大学公共卫生学院;5.中国健康促进与教育协会疾病预防控制分会;6.常州市疾病预防控制中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R183

基金项目:

上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2015年-2017年)项目(GWIV-32);安徽省高校智库项目(皖教工委(2015)271号);健康相关重大社会风险预警协同创新中心科研基金


Comparative study on effective utilization of infectious disease information in Zhejiang and Shanghai and its influence on prevention and control of infectious diseases
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Health Management,Anhui Medical University;2.Center for Health Development Strategy,Fudan University;3.School of Public Health and Management,Chongqing Medical University;4.School of Public Health,Shandong University;5.Chinese Association for Health Promotion and Education;6.Changzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Fund Project:

Shanghai municipal three-year action plan on strengthening public health system construction (2015-2017) project (gwiv-32); Anhui university think tank project (anhui education commission (2015) no. 271); Research fund of collaborative innovation center for early warning of health-related major social risks

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:分析比较浙沪两地传染病信息有效利用的程度及差异,探索量化传染病信息有效利用程度的可行性。方法:系统收集涉及浙沪两地公开发布的传染病信息利用的文献及信息报告,量化计算有效利用程度;运用 Spearman 相关、线性回归分析关注传染病信息有效利用程度与甲、乙类传染病发病率之间的关系。结果:浙江传染病信息有效利用程度从 2000 年0.3%上升到 2017 年的 9.8%,上海从 2000 年的2.9%上升到 17.5%;浙沪两地的及时程度与甲、乙类传染病发病率呈显著负相关关系(p<0.01),对传染病发病的解释程度分别为 47.2%和79.2%。结论:浙沪两地传染病信息有效利用的程度有差异,浙江的利用程度较低;有效利用疾病监测信息是做好传染病防制工作的前提;两地仍要加强传染病疾病信息的有效利用;量化一个国家(或地区)传染病信息有效利用程度的方法是科学可行的,可推广应用于其他公共卫生领域或地区。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To analyze and compare the effective utilization of infectious disease information between Zhejiang and Shanghai and explore the feasibility of quantifying the effective utilization of infectious disease information. Methods: Literatures and information reports on the utilization of infectious disease information published in Zhejiang and Shanghai were collected systematically, and the effective utilization degree was calculated quantitatively. Spearman correlation and linear regression were used to analyze the relationship between the effective utilization of infectious disease information and the incidence of class a and b infectious diseases. Results: The effective use of information on infectious diseases in Zhejiang increased from 0.3% in 2000 to 9.8% in 2017, and from 2.9% in 2000 to 17.5% in Shanghai. There was a significant negative correlation between the timeliness of Zhejiang and Shanghai and the incidence of class a and b infectious diseases (p<0.01), with 47.2% and 79.2% explaining the incidence of infectious diseases respectively. Conclusion: The effective use of information of infectious diseases in Zhejiang and Shanghai is different, but the use of information in Zhejiang is low. Timely identification of epidemic information of infectious diseases, early warning and prediction, implementation of intervention measures, emergency response and evaluation of prevention and control effects are the preconditions for the control of infectious diseases, the reduction of morbidity and the prevention and control of infectious diseases. Both places still need to enhance the effective use of information on infectious diseases; It is scientifically feasible to quantify the effective use of infectious disease information in a country (or region) and can be extended to other public health areas or regions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-22
  • 最后修改日期:2019-06-17
  • 录用日期:2019-12-18
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码