疫情防控风险交流制度的检视与重构
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

天津商业大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

‘互联网+’与政府规制策略研究


Inspection and reconstruction of risk exchange system for epidemic prevention and control
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    作为疫情防控风险化解的一种方式,风险交流在应对疫情防控过程中产生的信息异化及决策难等问题发挥了重要的作用。我国在此次新冠肺炎疫情防控中形成了一定特色的风险交流经验和做法。当然,在当前的疫情防控中,仍然存在风险交流碎片化、风险交流权利不对称、新媒体过度交流异化风险信息、缺失相应配套机制等问题。因此,可以在借鉴国外有关风险交流经验基础上,从明确风险交流边界、平衡各主体权利义务、完善疫情防控风险交流实施程序、优化救济制度等方面加以构建。

    Abstract:

    As a way to resolve the risk of epidemic prevention and control, risk exchange has played an important role in dealing with the problems of information alienation and difficult decision-making in the process of epidemic prevention and control. Covid-19 has formed a certain risk exchange experience and practice in the new crown pneumonia prevention and control. Of course, in the current epidemic prevention and control, there are still some problems, such as legal defects, fragmentation of risk exchange, asymmetry of risk exchange rights, excessive exchange of alienated risk information by new media, lack of corresponding supporting mechanisms and so on. Therefore, it can be constructed from the aspects of repairing laws and regulations, improving the capacity-building of the main team, balancing the rights and obligations of each main body, improving the implementation procedures of risk exchange for epidemic prevention and control, optimizing the relief system and so on.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-04
  • 最后修改日期:2022-04-11
  • 录用日期:2022-04-19
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码