基于扎根理论的医患共同决策在恶性肿瘤疾病中实施的影响因素模型构建
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京医科大学医政学院;2.陆方

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

江苏高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队 “公共健康政策与管理创新研究团队”资助


Construction of influencing factors model of doctor-patient shared decision making in malignant tumor disease based on grounded theory
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探索医患共同决策在恶性肿瘤疾病治疗中的应用现状及影响因素,构建影响因素的理论模型,采用半结构访谈法对江苏省某大型三甲医院的医生和患者进行深度访谈,基于扎根理论,通过Nvivo20.0软件对访谈文本进行三级编码,最终归纳梳理出47个概念、20个子范畴和9个主范畴。以“环境”“患者”“医生”“决策”作为4个核心范畴,外部环境、医疗体系、患者参与意愿、患者个人特征、决策成本、决策伦理、决策信息、医生态度、医生能力为9个主范畴,共同构成了医患共同决策在恶性肿瘤疾病治疗中影响因素的理论模型。医患共同决策的落实受多重因素影响,政府需要通过法律法规,营造良好的信息环境,医患之间需要有效沟通,深刻理解双方诉求,尊重患者权益,逐步弥合信息不对等带来的差距,提升医疗满意度。

    Abstract:

    In order to explore the application status and influencing factors of doctor-patient shared decision-making in the treatment of malignant tumor diseases to construct a theoretical model of influencing factors. The semi-structured interview method was used to conduct in-depth interviews with doctors and patients in a large top-three hospital in Jiangsu Province. Based on the grounded theory, the interview text was coded at the three levels by Nvivo20.0 software. Finally, 47 concepts, 20 sub-categories and 9 main categories are summarized and sorted out. With "environment", "patient", "doctor" and "decision" as the four core categories, and external environment, medical system, patients" willingness to participate, patients" personal characteristics, decision-making cost, decision-making ethics, decision-making information, doctors" attitude and doctors" ability as the nine main categories, the theoretical model of influencing factors of doctor-patient shared decision-making in the treatment of malignant tumor diseases is formed. The implementation of doctor-patient shared decision-making is affected by multiple factors. The government needs to create a good information environment through laws and regulations, effectively communicate between doctors and patients, deeply understand the demands of both sides, respect the rights and interests of patients, and gradually bridge the gap caused by information inequality to improve medical satisfaction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-28
  • 最后修改日期:2024-02-06
  • 录用日期:2024-02-19
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: