中国门诊慢特病保障政策的省际差异分析 ——以四类疾病为例
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,医学信息研究所;2.中国财政科学研究院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金(24FGLB090)城乡居民医保患者门诊费用风险及共济保障机制完善研究(负责人:张小娟)


Heterogeneity in China's Outpatient Chronic and Special Disease Benefit Schemes: Evidence from Four Diseases
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences &2.Peking Union Medical College;3.Chinese Academy of Fiscal Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章以消化系统疾病、神经系统疾病、心脏病及罕见病这四大类疾病作为研究对象,依托27个省份的政策文件与医保统计数据,运用文献分析与定量研究相结合的方法,剖析上述四类门诊慢特病保障政策的省际差异。研究结果显示,各省在病种覆盖范围方面存在极为显著的差异,且该差异与各省普通门诊统筹水平存在一定关联;同一病种在不同省份的待遇保障水平差距极大,以阿尔茨海默病为例,其支付限额差距可达数倍。此外,罕见病的门诊慢特病保障体系仍不完善,保障力度不足。针对上述问题,一是改革重住院轻门诊的医保待遇保障体系,提高普通门诊保障水平,并同步推动慢特病保障模式从“病种扩面”向“费用风险分担”转变;二是依托大数据技术合理确定高费用病种并规范保障标准,加强省份间政策协同;三是构建多层次、多元化的罕见病保障机制,切实提高门诊慢特病保障的公平性。

    Abstract:

    Taking four major categories of diseases—digestive system diseases, nervous system diseases, heart diseases, and rare diseases—as the research objects, this paper analyzes the inter-provincial differences in the outpatient chronic and special disease guarantee policies for the above four categories by relying on policy documents and medical insurance statistics from 27 provinces, and adopting a combination of literature analysis and quantitative research methods. The research results show that there are extremely significant differences in the scope of disease coverage among various provinces, and such differences have a certain correlation with the level of general outpatient pooling in each province; the level of treatment guarantee for the same disease varies greatly among different provinces. Taking Alzheimer's disease as an example, the gap in its payment limit can reach several times. In addition, the outpatient chronic and special disease guarantee system for rare diseases is still imperfect, with insufficient guarantee intensity. To address the above problems, first, reform the medical insurance treatment guarantee system that emphasizes inpatient care over outpatient care, improve the level of general outpatient care, and simultaneously promote the transformation of the chronic and special disease guarantee model from "expanding disease coverage" to "cost risk sharing"; second, rely on big data technology to reasonably identify high-cost diseases, standardize guarantee standards, and strengthen inter-provincial policy coordination; third, establish a multi-level and diversified guarantee mechanism for rare diseases to effectively improve the fairness of outpatient chronic and special disease guarantee.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-26
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-21
  • 录用日期:2026-04-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭