“卫生救国”与社会改造:邵象伊公共卫生思想的多元图景(1930—1949)
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学人文社会科学学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目


Sanitation for National Salvation and Social Transformation: A Multifaceted Portrait of Shao Xiangyi''s Public Health Thought (1930–1949)
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    邵象伊(1909—1990)是中国近代公共卫生学的奠基人之一,其医学社会思想价值长期未获充分认知。以民国时期邵象伊发表于《医事公论》《社会医药报》等刊物的原始文献为核心,系统考察其公共卫生思想的内在逻辑。研究发现:邵象伊以“科学化、革命化、平民化”三原则为统摄性框架,将德国公共卫生经验、对“文明病”的社会批判、战时卫生动员等整合为“社会病理学”。“科学化”体现为对德国种族卫生政策的批判性引介及对“伪科学化”的持续抨击;“革命化”表现为对现代性身体代价、性别规训及学术沉疴的战斗性介入;“平民化”则落实为“到民间去”、公立医院大众化及非常时期的全民动员。其思想本质是以医学为起点的社会诊断学,应在近代思想史上获得独立位置。

    Abstract:

    Shao Xiangyi (1909–1990) was one of the founders of modern public health in China and also a long-overlooked medical social thinker. Based on his original writings published during the Republic of China era in journals such as Medical Affairs Public Discussion and Social Medicine Newspaper, this study reconstructs the internal logic of his public health philosophy. The research reveals that Shao Xiangyi employed the three guiding principles of "scientification, revolutionization, and popularization" as a comprehensive framework, integrating German public health experiences, his social critique of "civilized diseases," and wartime health mobilization into what he termed "social pathology." The "scientification" principle manifested in his critical introduction of Germany''s racial hygiene policies and his sustained criticism of "pseudo-scientific practices"; the "revolutionization" principle reflected his combative engagement with the bodily costs of modernity, gender discipline, and entrenched academic ailments; while the "popularization" principle was embodied in initiatives such as "going to the grassroots," the democratization of public hospitals, and nationwide mobilization during extraordinary times. At its core, his thought represents a social diagnostic approach rooted in medicine, which should secure an independent position in the history of modern intellectual thought.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-25
  • 最后修改日期:2026-10-05
  • 录用日期:2026-10-09
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭