剑桥大学?牛津大学 “学院制”教育模式对我国高等教育改革与建设的启示
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


An enlightenment from the collegiate system of Cambridge University and Oxford University to high education reform in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    剑桥大学?牛津大学实行别具一格的“学院制”教育模式,在大学内设有两种平行的学院:从事教学?研究及社会服务与科技开发等学术活动的学院,以及进行本科生人才培养教育活动的学院?这种教育模式为不同专业背景的大学生提供了相互交流?相互学习的成长环境,建立了专业教师深入学生学习?成长过程进行全面指导的强力纽带,搭建了以人为本?因材施教?个性发展的育人平台?“学院制”教育模式的内涵正是我国在高等教育改革与建设中需要重塑和固化的核心价值?

    Abstract:

    Cambridge University and Oxford University have been implementing their distinctive educational pattern of collegiate system. Two types of parallel school or college, one for teaching, research, social services, science and technology development and other acedemic activities, named “school”, or “faculty” or “department” and the other for undergradautes’ educational activities and talent training, named “college”, are established in university. Colleges are responsible for enrolling students who major in different specialties and offer the students who live and study in the same college academic guidance and life coaching. Simultaneously employed in a certain college, the majority of course’s staff in a school/department have dual attributes, tutoring small-classed undergraduates and guiding both their life and academic activities. This educational pattern offers undergraduates of different specialties and backgrounds a growing environment of mutual communiciation and learning, builds a strong bond between course’s staff and students by getting involved in their students’ study and offering them comprehensive guidances in the course of their development, and establishes a talent training platform based on human-orientedness, persoanlized instruction and individuality development. The connotation of the educational pattern of collegiate system is just the core value needed to be remodelled and solidified in the higher education reform and construction in our country.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

季晓辉,李 茜.剑桥大学?牛津大学 “学院制”教育模式对我国高等教育改革与建设的启示[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2011,(4):256~259

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2011-07-06
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码