《侵权责任法》医疗损害责任归责原则研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


A research of medical damage liability on the “Tort Liability Act”
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    《侵权责任法》“医疗损害责任”一章根据医疗损害责任的不同类型,采取不同的归责原则,构建了一个以过错责任原则为基础,特殊情形下的过错推定以及无过错责任原则为补充的医疗损害责任归责原则体系,找到了综合受害患者?医疗机构和全体患者之间的利益关系的最佳平衡点,科学地处理了不同的利益关系?但是《侵权责任法》规定的医疗损害责任归责原则体系并不严谨,在规范设计和语言表述等方面也还存在一些问题,缺乏应有的逻辑性和严谨性,可能会影响《侵权责任法》的准确解释和正确适用,所以还需要进一步的规范和完善?

    Abstract:

    In “Tort Liability Act”, a chapter “medical malpractice liability” based on different types of medical malpractice liability takes a different responsibility principle, in order to build a fault liability based on the principle of presumption of fault under special circumstances as well as the principle of liability without fault to supplement liability for medical damages principle system, find the best balance point that balanced injured patients, medical institutions, and the relationship between the interests of all patients, and scientifically handle the different interests relationship. However, the liability adscription principle system of medical malpractice is not strict, some problems exist in the standard design, language representation, and lacking of logic, which may affect the accurate interpretation and correct application of “Tort Liability Act”, and need further standardization and improvement.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

岳远雷.《侵权责任法》医疗损害责任归责原则研究[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(5):391~394

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-29
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-10-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码