疫情防控风险交流制度的检视与重构
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

陈丹(1981—),女,湖北武汉人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为行政法学,通信作者,chendan737@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R184;D922.16

基金项目:

天津哲学社会科学规划课题重点项目“‘互联网+’与政府规制策略研究”(TJFX16-002)


Inspection and reconstruction of the risk exchange system for epidemic prevention and control
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    作为疫情防控风险化解的一种方式,风险交流在应对疫情防控过程中产生的信息异化及决策难等问题上发挥了重要作用。我国在此次新冠肺炎疫情防控中形成了一定特色的风险交流经验和做法。当然,在当前的疫情防控中,仍然存在部分法律缺陷、风险交流碎片化、风险交流权利不对称、新媒体过度交流异化风险信息以及缺失相应配套机制等问题。因此,可以在借鉴国外有关风险交流经验的基础上,从修缮法律法规、完善主体队伍能力建设、平衡各主体权利义务、 完善疫情防控风险交流实施程序、优化救济制度等方面加以解决。

    Abstract:

    As a way to resolve the risk of epidemic prevention and control,risk exchange has played an important role in dealing with the problems of information alienation and difficult decision?making in the process of epidemic prevention and control. China has developed risk exchange experience and practice in the prevention and control of COVID ? 19. Certainly,in the current epidemic prevention and control,there are still some problems,such as legal defects,fragmentation of risk exchange,asymmetry of risk exchange rights, alienated risk information due to excessive new media communication,lack of corresponding supporting mechanisms and so on. Therefore,based on the foreign experience in risk communication,it can be constructed from the aspects of repairing laws and regulations,improving the capacity building of the main team,balancing the rights and obligations of each main body,improving the implementation procedures of risk exchange for epidemic prevention and control,optimizing the aid system and so on.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈丹,单爽爽.疫情防控风险交流制度的检视与重构[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(3):260~266

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-06-30
  • 出版日期: