CT肺小血管定量参数评估不同类型肺动脉高压的应用研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R544.16

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(82171907)


Application study of quantitative parameters of small pulmonary vessels on CT in evaluating different types of pulmonary hypertension
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨基于胸部CT测量的肺小血管参数在评估肺动脉高压(pulmonary hypertension,PH)分型及结缔组织疾病相关肺高压(connective tissue diseases-related pulmonary hypertension,CTD-PH)严重程度分级中的临床价值。方法:回顾性纳入 170例PH患者,包括60例CTD-PH患者、52例特发性PH(idiopathic pumonary hypertension,IPAH)患者和58例慢性阻塞性肺疾病相关 PH(chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-rebated pulmonary hypertension,COPD-PH)患者,同时纳入 120 例健康受试者 (health control,HC)作为对照。基于胸部CT测量横截面面积(cross-sectional area,CSA)<5 mm2 的肺小血管CSA之和及CSA 5~ 10 mm2 的肺小血管CSA之和与肺总CSA的比率(%CSA<5和%CSA5-10),采用单因素方差分析或Kruskal-Wallis检验比较4组之间%CSA<5和%CSA5-10的差异,并进行组间两两比较。采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析% CSA区分重度CTD-PH(CTD-S-PH组)和中重度CTD-PH(CTD-LM-PH组)的能力,计算曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)、灵敏度及特异度。结果:与HC组比较,IPAH组和COPD-PH组的%CSA<5均小于HC组(P均<0.001),COPD-PH组的%CSA5-10低于 HC组(P=0.038),而CTD-PH和IPAH组的%CSA5-10均显著高于HC组(P均< 0.05)。不同类型PH组间比较,CTD-PH的%CSA<5 和%CSA5-10均高于COPD-PH组(P均<0.001),IPAH组的%CSA5-10显著高于CTD-PH组(P=0.022),而IPAH和COPD-PH组的% CSA<5差异无统计学意义(P= 0.833)。CTD-S-PH 组患者的%CSA<5显著低于 CTD-LM-PH 组(P=0.004)。ROC 曲线分析结果显示,%CSA<5预测 CTD-S-PH的最佳截断值为0.804,AUC为0.710(95%CI:0.573~0.847),灵敏度为0.714,特异度为0.320。结论:基于胸部CT定量的肺小血管参数%CSA可以区分不同类型PH。在CTD-PH人群中,%CSA<5可作为评估PH严重程度分级的参考依据。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To investigate the clinical value of small pulmonary vessels parameters measured by chest CT in evaluating the classification of different types of pulmonary hypertension(PH)and the severity grading of connective tissue disease s - related pulmonary hypertension(CTD-PH). Methods:A retrospective analysis included 170 PH patients,including 60 CTD-PH patients,52 idiopathic PH(IPAH)patients,and 58 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - related PH(COPD - PH)patients,with 120 healthy controls(HC)included as controls. The ratio of the sum of the cross-sectional area(CSA)of small pulmonary vessels with CSA <5 mm2 (%CSA<5)and between 5 to 10 mm2( %CSA5- 10)to the total CSA of the lung measured by chest CT was compared among the four groups using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test,followed by pairwise comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was used to evaluate the performance of %CSA for differentiating mild to moderate CTD-PH(CTD-LM-PH)from severe CTD-PH(CTD-S-PH)patients,and calculate the area under the curve(AUC),sensitivity and specificity. Results:The %CSA<5 of the IPAH and COPD -PH groups were significantly lower compared to the HC group(P < 0.001). Additionally,the %CSA5 - 10 of the COPD -PH group showed a significant decline compared to the HC group(P=0.038),whereas the %CSA5-10 of the CTD-PH and IPAH groups was significantly high compared to the HC group(both P < 0.05). In comparisons between different types of PH groups,the %CSA<5 and % CSA5 - 10 of the CTD - PH group were higher than those of the COPD - PH group(P < 0.001). The % CSA5 - 10 of the IPAH group was significantly higher than that of the CTD -PH group(P=0.022),while there was no significant difference in the %CSA<5 between the IPAH and COPD-PH groups(P=0.833). The %CSA<5 of CTD-S-PH group was significantly lower than that of CTD-LM-PH group(P= 0.004). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value for %CSA<5 to predict CTD -S -PH was 0.804,with an AUC of 0.710(95%CI:0.573-0.847),sensitivity of 0.714 and specificity of 0.320. Conclusion:The quantitative parameter %CSA assessed by chest CT can distinguish different types of PH. The %CSA<5 can serve as a reference for evaluating the severity of CTD-PH.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐承啸,张月,张宁,祝因苏,鲁珊珊. CT肺小血管定量参数评估不同类型肺动脉高压的应用研究[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2024,(6):832-837

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-06-11
  • 出版日期:
通知关闭
郑重声明