早期SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌患者ESD及外科治疗术后生存预后比较
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学第一附属医院消化内科,江苏 南京 210029

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R735.1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(81970499)


Comparison of postoperative survival outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgical treatment in patients with early Siewert typeⅡadenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastroenterology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029 ,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:评估早期Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌(adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction,AEGJ)患者接受内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)与根治性手术的长期生存结局差异。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月—2021年 2月于单中心三级医疗中心接受治疗的562例早期Siewert Ⅱ型AEGJ患者,其中接受ESD治疗393例,根治性手术治疗169例。通过倾向评分匹配(propensity score matching,PSM)平衡基线特征后,采用Kaplan-Meier法评估早期Siewert Ⅱ型AEGJ患者ESD 和外科手术的生存差异。结果:562例患者的中位随访时间为57.7个月(范围6.2~147.0个月)。经过PSM后生成了2个平衡组,每组包含163例患者。ESD组和手术组的5年总生存率差异无统计学意义(92.5% vs. 90.7%,P=0.734)。两组患者的总生存期(P=0.95)、疾病特异性生存期(P=0.18)差异均无统计学意义。不良事件分析显示,两组在淋巴结转移(6.7% vs. 7.4%,P= 0.829)、局部复发(4.9% vs. 9.2%,P=0.130)、术后狭窄(3.7% vs. 1.2%,P=0.152)及出血(1.2% vs. 0.6%,P=0.562)方面不存在统计学差异,但手术组的反酸症状发生率更高(11.0% vs. 3.1%,P=0.005)。结论:ESD与手术治疗早期SiewertⅡ型AEGJ的长期生存结局相似,提示ESD可作为该人群的有效替代治疗方案。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To compare the long-term prognosis of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)versus surgical treatment in patients with early Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction(AEGJ). Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 562 patients with early Siewert type Ⅱ AEGJ who underwent ESD or radical surgery at a single tertiary medical center between January 2010 and February 2021,including 393 cases treated with ESD and 169 cases treated with radical surgery. After balancing baseline characteristics using propensity score matching(PSM),the Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare long-term survival outcomes between ESD and surgical treatment. Results:The median follow-up time for all 562 patients was 57.7 months (range 6.2-147.0 months). After PSM,two balanced cohorts of 163 patients each were generated. The 5-year overall survival(OS) rates showed no significant difference between the ESD and surgery groups(92.5% vs. 90.7%,P=0.734). Similarly,no significant differences were observed in OS(P=0.95)or disease-specific survival(P=0.18)between the two groups. The analysis of adverse events showed no significant differences between the two groups in lymph node metastasis(6.7% vs. 7.4%,P=0.829),local recurrence(4.9% vs. 9.2%,P=0.130),postoperative stenosis(3.7% vs. 1.2%,P=0.152),or bleeding(1.2% vs. 0.6%,P=0.562). However,the incidence of acid reflux symptoms was significantly higher in the surgery group(11.0% vs. 3.1%,P=0.005). Conclusion:ESD and surgical treatment for early-stage Siewert type Ⅱ AEGJ demonstrate similar long-term survival outcomes,suggesting that ESD can be an effective alternative treatment for this patient population.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郁馨,杨若云,陈涵,周晓颖,张国新.早期SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌患者ESD及外科治疗术后生存预后比较[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2025,45(7):973-983

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-17
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-10
  • 出版日期:
关闭