早期胃癌治疗方式的选择
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京医科大学第一附属医院消化内科/消化内镜科;2.南京医科大学第三附属医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Selection of treatment for early gastric Cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Gastroenterology/Digestive Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;2.Yu Lianzhen

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较内镜黏膜下剥离术( endoscopic submucosal dissection ESD) 与外科手术治疗早期胃癌的临床病理特征,探讨ESD治疗早期胃癌的绝对适应症及扩大适应症,为早期胃癌选择最佳治疗方案提供依据。方法 对江苏省人民医院收治的484例早期胃癌病灶的临床病理特征进行前瞻性观察,其中ESD治疗的162例(163个病灶)作为观察组,同期行外科手术治疗的322例(332个病灶)作为对照组。 结果 ①筛选为内镜下切除标准的ESD组与外科组经多因素分析结果显示:术前病理有癌变、平坦/凹陷型、溃疡和浸润至粘膜下层为选择外科手术的独立因素(风险比=25.970,3.970,2.283,7.244,5.038,95%可信区间为12.505-53.919,1.541-10.284,3.254-16.126,2.397-10.592,P<0.05 )。②ESD组中,绝对/扩大适应症对治疗标准的总体准确率为93.7%(153/163)。10例超内镜适应症病灶均为未分化型,ESD组中有14例病灶病理为未分化型,另外4例病灶有2例达扩大标准的治愈性切除。③多因素分析出病灶位置、病灶大小、浸润深度及淋巴脉管浸润为早期胃癌淋巴结转移的独立因素(风险比=4.433,2.413,3.510,43.701,95%可信区间为1.315-14.941,0.985-5.912,1.276-9.655,15.565-122.692,P<0.05 )。④外科组中非内镜下切除标准病灶的淋巴结转移率为32.21%,符合内镜下切除绝对适应症与扩大适应症病灶的淋巴结转移率分别为1.96%、3.3%。绝对适应症与扩大适应症病灶的淋巴结转移率比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.428,P=0.51)。结论1.ESD与外科手术治疗早期胃癌患者治疗方式选择中,术前病理有癌变、平坦/凹陷型、溃疡和粘膜下层浸润为选择外科手术的独立因素。符合内镜下切除标准的早癌患者,特别是扩大适应症、术前病理呈现癌变、平坦/凹陷型的早期胃癌患者中有很大一部分选择外科手术。2. 胃中部、>2cm、浸润至粘膜下层及有淋巴脉管浸润为早期胃癌淋巴结转移的独立因素。3.符合内镜下切除标准绝对适应症与扩大适应症的病灶在淋巴结转移率上差异无统计学意义,但扩大适应症中未分化型早癌临床选择准确率较低,故符合内镜下扩大适应症中分化型者可行ESD

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the difference of clinicopathological characteristics of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgery of early gastric cancer patients, and to investigate the difference of the absolute and expanded criteria for ESD, so as to provide a basis for choosing the best treatment for early gastric cancer. Methods The clinicopathological data of 484 early gastric cancer lesions in Jiang Su Provincial Hospital were prospectively observed .Among them, 162 patients (163lesions) treated with ESD as the observation group, and 322patients (332lesions) treated with surgery as the control group. Results ①Multivariate analysis showed that endoscopic forceps biopsy with carcinoma, flat/depressed type, ulcer, and submucosal invasion were independent risk factors for the selection of surgery(hazard ratio=4.433,2.413,3.510,43.701,95%confidence interval: 1.315-14.941,0.985-5.912,1.276-9.655,15.565-122.692,P<0.05 ). ② Of the ESD group, the overall accuracy of absolute/expanded indications for treatment criteria was 93.7% (153/163). The pathology of 10 lesions met the surgical criteria were undifferentiated. In the ESD group, 14 lesions were undifferentiated, and 2 of the 4 lesions met expanded criteria of curative resection.③Multivariate analysis showed that tumor location , tumor size , depth of invasion , and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis(hazard ratio=4.433,2.413,3.510,43.701,95% confidence interval: 1.315-14.941,0.985-5.912,1.276-9.655,15.565-122.692,P<0.05 ).④ In the surgical group, the lymph node metastasis rate of surgery criteria ,absolute criteria and expanded criteria were 32.21%, 1.96% and 3.3%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in lymph node metastasis rate between the absolute criteria and expanded criteria(F=0.428,P=0.51). Conclusions 1.In the choice of treatment methods of early gastric cancer, endoscopic forceps biopsy with carcinoma, flat/depressed type, ulcer and submucosal invasion were the independent risk factors for surgery. However there still many patients who meet the endoscopic resection criteria, especially those meet expanded criteria, endoscopic forceps biopsy with carcinoma, and flat/depressed type of early gastric cancer choose surgery. 2.The tumor located in the middle-third of the stomach, the tumor size>2cm, submucosal invasion and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. 3.There was no statistically significant difference in lymph node metastasis between the absolute criteria and expanded criteria . However, the accuracy of clinical selection of undifferentiated early cancer in the expanded indications was lower, so ESD is suitable for patients with differentiated indications in expanded criteria.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-08
  • 最后修改日期:2020-03-11
  • 录用日期:2020-09-07
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
关闭