GeneXpert法与涂片抗酸染色法检测结核分枝杆菌的比较研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京中医药大学附属南京医院(南京市第二医院)检验检测中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparative study of GeneXpert and smear acid-fast staining methods in Mycobacterium tuberculosis diagnosis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较GeneXpert法和涂片抗酸染色法在多种样本来源的结核分枝杆菌检测中的准确性及有效性,为结核病的诊断和治疗提供依据。方法:用GeneXpert法和涂片法对766份结核及疑似结核患者的标本进行结核分枝杆菌检测,其中460例同步进行了结核培养,并对各种方法的检出阳性率进行比较。结果:766份标本分别用涂片法和GeneXpert法进行检测,涂片法的总体阳性率为24.0%,GeneXpert法的总体阳性率为40.1%,两者差异具有统计学意义(?2=85.47,P<0.001)。对不同的标本类型的检测结果进行统计分析,473例痰液的涂片法和GeneXpert法阳性率分别为29.4%和39.1%(?2=24.60,P<0.01);185例灌洗液涂片和GeneXpert阳性率分别为21.1%和53.0%(?2=47.68,P<0.01);61例胸腹水涂片和GeneXpert阳性率分别为3.3%和19.7%(?2=8.10,P<0.01);47例其他标本类型(包括尿液、脑脊液、大便、脓液等)涂片和GeneXpert阳性率分别为8.5%和25.5%(?2=6.13,P<0.05);各种标本类型两种方法的差异均具有统计学意义。766份标本中两方法合并阳性率为43.6%。对其中的460例标本同时进行结核分枝杆菌培养,涂片法、GeneXpert法和培养法的阳性率分别为28.5%、47.0%和35.4%,3种方法之间两两比较均存在显著性差异。结论:GeneXpert法检测各种标本的阳性率明显高于涂片法,能更好地为临床结核病的诊断提供实验室依据。

    Abstract:

    Objectives: To provide the theoretical basis of rapid Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) diagnosis in clinical laboratory, we investigated the accuracy and efficacy of GeneXpert and smear acid-fast staining method in diagnosis of MTB within different samples. Methods: Totally 766 samples including sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLAF), pleuroperitoneal fluids and other samples (urine, cerebrospinal fluid, stool, fester) from MTB and suspected MTB patients were tested with GeneXpert and smear acid-fast staining method, positive rate were analyzed. Results: Overall positive rate shows significant different ?2=85.47,P<0.001 between GeneXpert and smear acid-fast staining method (40.1% and 24.0%, respectively). The positive rate of sputum, BLAF, pleuroperitoneal fluids and other samples after GeneXpert detection were 39.1%, 53.0%, 19.7% and 25.5%, respectively. After smear acid-fast staining, those samples indicated with the significant lower positive rate (29.4%, ?2=24.60,P<0.01;21.1%, ?2=47.68,P<0.01;3.3%, ?2=8.10,P<0.01; 8.5%, ?2=6.13,P<0.05, respectively). The Combined positive rate was 43.6% among 766 samples. In addition, MTB culture was performed among 460 specimens. The positive rate of smear acid-fast staining, GeneXpert and MTB culture in 460 specimens demonstrated significant difference between each other (28.5%, 47.0% and 35.4% respectively). Conclusions: The higher positive rate of GeneXpert method in MTB detection demonstrated that GeneXpert is a reliable MTB diagnostic method in clinical laboratory.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-05
  • 最后修改日期:2021-11-01
  • 录用日期:2022-01-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: