切口设计及修复情况对上前牙美学区显微根尖手术术后牙龈退缩影响的回顾性研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学附属口腔医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学青年基金


Retrospective study of the effect of incision design and restoration on gingival recession after endodontic microsurgery in anterior maxillary esthetic zone
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:回顾性研究切口类型及修复体对上前牙美学区根尖手术后牙龈退缩的影响。方法:53例上前牙美学区需行显微根管外科(endodontic microsurgery,EMS)手术患者,术后随访一年以上,观察性别、切口类型(龈沟内切口sulcular incision,ISI;龈乳头基部切口papilla base incision,PBI)、修复体情况(无修复体no restoration,NR;有修复体crown margin,CM)对上前牙美学区根尖手术后牙龈退缩的影响。结果:共采集53例临床冠及78例龈乳头数据并对其分析表明,性别和切口类型对术后牙龈退缩无显著影响。但ISI组龈乳头高度(Gingival nipple height,H2)明显变小且差异有统计学意义。按修复体有无对比结果分析表明,临床冠高度(clinical crown height,H1)变化ΔH1与切缘龈乳头距离(cut-margin gingival papilla distance,H3)变化ΔH3有统计学意义(P < 0.05);CM组ΔH1 = (0.476 ± 0.387)mm与NR组ΔH1 = (0.146 ± 0.137)mm;CM组ΔH3 = (0.221 ± 0.354)mm与NR组ΔH3 = (0.023 ± 0.338)mm。结论:上前牙美学区患牙EMS术后存在一定程度牙龈退缩,修复体的存在会使牙龈退缩加重,影响前牙区美学效果。我们需在术前充分沟通告知患者,具有临床指导意义。

    Abstract:

    Objective: Evaluate the effect of incision design and restorations on gingival recession after endodontic microsurgery(EMS) in anterior maxillary esthetic zone. Methods: Data from 53 EMS cases in the anterior esthetic zone(with a follow-up period of at least 1 year) were collected. Cases were categorized based on gender, incision type(intrasulcular incision , ISI ; papilla based incision,PBI),and the presence of restorations(no restoration, NR; crown margin, CM). The influence of different factors on gingival recession in the anterior esthetic zone after EMS were analyzed. Results: Data of 53 clinical crowns and 78 gingival papillae were collected. Gender had no significant effect on gingival recession. The incision type had no significant effect on gingival recession,but the gingival papilla was significantly reduced by ISI(P < 0.05). According to whether the restoration has contrast, the change of Clinical crown height (ΔH1) and the change of cut-margin gingival papilla distance(ΔH 3) had statistically significant difference(P < 0.05).CM group ΔH1 = (0.476 ± 0.387) mm and NR group ΔH1 = (0.146 ± 0.137) mm;CM Group ΔH3 = (0.221 ± 0.354)mm and NR group ΔH3 = (0.023 ± 0.338)mm. Conclusion: There was a certain degree of gingival retraction after EMS in anterior maxillary esthetic zone, and the presence of restoration would aggravate gingival retraction and affect the esthetic effect of anterior teeth.We need to communicate with the patient before the operation, with clinical guidance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-25
  • 最后修改日期:2024-04-21
  • 录用日期:2024-06-14
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
关闭