CT肺小血管定量参数评估不同类型肺高压的应用研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京医科大学第一附属医院放射科;2.南京医科大学第一附属医院心脏科;3.南京医科大学第一附属医院风湿科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)面上项目82171907


Clinical application of quantitative parameters of small pulmonary vessels on CT in evaluation of different types of pulmonary hypertension
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨基于胸部CT测量的肺小血管参数在评估肺高压(PH)分型及结缔组织疾病相关肺高压(CTD-PH)严重程度分级中的临床价值。 方法:回顾性纳入170例PH患者,包括60名CTD-PH患者、52名特发性PH(iPH)患者和58名慢性阻塞性肺疾病相关PH(COPD-PH)患者,同时纳入120名健康受试者(HC)作为对照。基于胸部CT测量横截面面积<5mm2及5-10mm2之间的肺小血管横截面积之和与肺总横截面积的比率(%CSA<5和%CSA5–10),采用单因素方差分析或Kruskal-Wallis检验比较四组之间%CSA<5和%CSA5–10的差异,并进行组间两两比较。采用受试者工作曲线(ROC)分析%CSA区分不同程度CTD-PH(轻度CTD-S-PH,n=25;中重度CTD-LM-PH,n=35)的能力,计算曲线下面积(AUC),敏感性及特异性。 结果:(1)同HC组相比,iPH组和COPD-PH组的%CSA<5均小于HC组(P均<0.001),COPD-PH组的%CSA5-10低于HC组(P = 0.038),而CTD-PH和iPH组的%CSA5-10均显著高于HC组(P均< 0.05)。(2)不同类型PH组间比较显示:CTD-PH的%CSA<5和%CSA5-10均高于COPD-PH组(P均<0.001),iPH组的%CSA5-10显著高于CTD-PH组(P=0.022),而iPH和COPD-PH组的%CSA<5没有显著差异(P = 0.833)。(3)CTD-S-PH组患者的%CSA<5显著低于CTD-LM-PH组(P =0.004)。ROC曲线分析结果显示:%CSA<5预测CTD-S-PH的最佳截断值为0.804,AUC为0.710(95%可信区间,0.573-0.847),灵敏度为71.4%,特异性为32.0%。 结论:基于胸部CT定量的肺小血管参数%CSA可以区分不同类型肺高压。在CTD-PH人群中,%CSA<5可作为评估PH严重程度分级的参考依据。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the ability of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of small pulmonary vessels on chest CT in distinguishing different types of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and the severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PH). Methods: This study retrospectively included 170 patients diagnosed as PH, including 60 patients with CTD-PH, 52 patients with idiopathic PAH (iPAH) (all diagnosed by right heart catheterization), and 58 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with PH (COPD-PH) diagnosed by echocardiography. We included 120 healthy controls (HCs) for comparison. The CSA <5mm2 and between 5-10mm2 of small pulmonary vessels as percentage of the total lung area (%CSA<5 and %CSA5–10) were measured on chest CT. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis test was used for comparison among the four groups as appropriate, followed by post-hoc test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of %CSA for differentiating light to moderate CTD-PH (CTD-LM-PH, n=25) from severe CTD-PH (CTD-S-PH, n=35) patients. The area under the curve (AUC), the sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results: (1) The %CSA<5 of iPH and COPD-PH were significantly lower than that of HC group (P<0.001). The %CSA5-10 of COPD-PH group was significantly lower than that of HC group (P=0.038), while the %CSA5-10 of CTD-PH and iPH groups was significantly higher than that of HC group (both P<0.05). (2) Among the four PH groups, the %CSA<5 and %CSA5-10 of CTD-PH were higher than those of COPD-PH (P<0.001). The %CSA5-10 of iPH group was significantly higher than that of CTD-PH group (P=0.022), while the %CSA<5 of iPH and COPD-PH showed no significant difference (P=0.833). (3) The %CSA<5 of CTD-S-PH group was significantly lower than that of CTD-LM-PH group (P=0.004). The ROC analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value for %CSA<5 to predict CTD-S-PH was 0.804, AUC was 0.710 (95%CI, 0.573-0.847), with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 32.0%. Conclusion: The quantitative parameters %CSA<5 and %CSA5–10 assessed by chest CT are useful for distinguishing different types of PH. In addition, the %CSA<5 can provide information for identification of CTD-PH severity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30
  • 最后修改日期:2024-03-16
  • 录用日期:2024-06-06
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
通知关闭
郑重声明