体外开窗技术治疗主动脉弓部病变的中期效果
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学第一附属医院心脏大血管外科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

南京医科大学2023年专病联盟公益项目(编号:JZ23349020230302)


Midterm outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft for aortic arch pathologies
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Public Welfare Project of Nanjing Medical University Alliance for Specific Diseases (JZ23349020230302)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探究胸主动脉腔内修复术(thoracic endovascular aortic repair,TEVAR)联合左锁骨下动脉(left subclavian artery,LSA)体外开窗技术治疗主动脉弓部病变中期结果。方法: 2018年1月至2021年12月期间南京医科大学第一附属医院收治111例行TEVAR联合LSA体外开窗技术进行治疗的患者,回顾性分析其围术期以及中期随访的临床材料。结果:总的来说,技术成功率为100%(111/111),30天内死亡率为3.6%(4/111),术后中位随访时间为33.0个月,全因死亡率为6.3%(7/111),主动脉相关的死亡率为2.7%(3/111),主要并发症中脑血管意外的有3例(2.7%),出现截瘫的有2例(1.8%),近端逆撕成A型主动脉夹层(retrograde type A dissection,RTAD)的有1例(0.9%),支架内漏有2例(1.8%),出现支架移植物引起远端新发破口(distal stent-induced new entry,dSINE)有3例(2.7%)。进行过主动脉二次干预的有4例(3.6%),其中3例(2.7%)是腔内手术,1例(0.9%)是开胸行人工血管置换手术。结论:TEVAR联合LSA体外开窗技术在治疗主动脉弓部病变的中期效果在可接受的范围内,但是仍然缺乏长期的观察结果数据。此外,开窗技术流程亟待规范统一,以及相关设备也待进一步开发。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the midterm outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft for aortic arch pathologies. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative period and mid-term follow-up clinical data of 111 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) combined with left subclavian artery (LSA) fenestration in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2018 to December 2021. Results: Overall, the technical success rate was 100% (111/111), the mortality rate within 30 days was 3.6% (4/111). The median postoperative follow-up time was 33.0 months, the all-cause mortality was 6.3% (7/111), the aorta-related mortality was 2.7% (3/111). Among the main complications, there were 3 patients (2.7%) of cerebrovascular accident, 2 patients (1.8%) of paraplegia, one patient (0.9%) of retrograde type A dissection (RTAD), 2 patients(1.8%) of endoleak, and 3 patients (2.7%) of distal stent-induced new entry (dSINE). Four patients (3.6%) underwent the second aortic intervention, of which 3 patients (2.7%) were performed endovascular surgery and one patient (0.9%) was performed thoracotomy and artificial vascular replacement. Conclusion: The mid-term outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft for aortic arch pathologies were within the acceptable range, however, further follow-up results are needed and long-term stability and durability needs to be assessed. In addition, the technical process of fenestration needs to be standardized and unified, and related equipment needs to be further developed.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-02
  • 最后修改日期:2024-04-12
  • 录用日期:2024-07-08
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
关闭