PET/MRI在头颈部肿瘤中的应用价值
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学第一附属医院

基金项目:

国家卫生健康委核医学重点实验室、江苏省分子核医学重点实验室项目


Application value of PET/MRI in head and neck cancer
Affiliation:

the First Affiliated Hospital of NJMU

Fund Project:

Project of Key Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine of National Health Commission and Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine of Jiangsu Province

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [53]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    头颈部肿瘤是常见的恶性肿瘤之一,多数患者确诊时已处于疾病中晚期,因此头颈部肿瘤的早期诊断、准确分期及疗效监测是优化治疗策略及改善预后的关键。一体化PET/MRI整合了分子功能与解剖结构成像,实现了PET与MRI的优势互补,将PET代谢功能信息与MRI良好软组织对比度相结合,真正实现多模态成像,在肿瘤诊疗过程中具有重要临床意义。本文主要探讨PET/MRI在头颈部肿瘤诊断分期、监测疗效、预测预后及制定放疗计划等方面的应用及进展。

    Abstract:

    Head and neck cancer is one of the common malignant tumors, and most patients are diagnosed in the middle and late stages of the disease. Therefore, early diagnosis, accurate staging and efficacy monitoring are the key to optimize the treatment strategy and improve the prognosis of head and neck cancer. Integrated PET/MRI integrates molecular function and anatomical structure imaging to achieve the advantages of PET and MRI. Combining the metabolic information of PET with the good soft tissue contrast of MRI to realize multimodal imaging has important clinical significance in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors. This review focuses on the application and progress of PET/MRI in the diagnosis, staging, monitoring treatment response, predicting prognosis and radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancer.

    参考文献
    参考文献
    [2] [1] MESIA R, IGLESIAS L, LAMBEA J, et al. SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of head and neck cancer (2020)[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2021,23(5): 913-921
    [3] [2] SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021,71(3): 209-249
    [4] [3] JOHNSON D E, BURTNESS B, LEEMANS C R, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2020,6(1): 92
    [5] [4] LINGL J P, BOHM F, SCHULER P J, et al. [Value of PET imaging in head and neck cancer][J]. HNO, 2023,71(10): 681-692
    [6] [5] MENG Z, ZHANG L, HUANG C, et al. Quantitative parameters derived from (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging can accurately estimate the histologic grade of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma preoperatively[J]. Neuroradiology, 2022,64(11): 2153-2162
    [7] [6] CHEN Y, DANG H, WU X, et al. Correlation between (18)F-FDG PET/MR parameters with the expression level of epidermal growth factor receptor and the diagnostic value of PET/MR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Heliyon, 2023,9(4): e14822
    [8] [7] ZHANG L, MENG Z, HUANG C, et al. Combined average standard uptake value and rate constant can predict expression of EGFR in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A pilot study with integrated PET/MRI[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2024,172: 111326
    [9] [8] GUZMAN P G, IVANIDZE J. PET/CT and PET/MR Imaging of the Post-treatment Head and Neck: Traps and Tips[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2022,32(1): 111-132
    [10] [9] RUHLMANN V, RUHLMANN M, BELLENDORF A, et al. Hybrid imaging for detection of carcinoma of unknown primary: A preliminary comparison trial of whole-body PET/MRI versus PET/CT[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2016,85(11): 1941-1947
    [11] [10] PARK J, PAK K, YUN T J, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy and Confidence of [18F] FDG PET/MRI in comparison with PET or MRI alone in Head and Neck Cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2020,10(1): 9490
    [12] [11] HUANG C, SONG T, MUKHERJI S K, et al. Comparative Study Between Integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the T and N Staging of Hypopharyngeal Cancer: An Initial Result[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2020,44(4): 540-545
    [13] [12] CHENG Y, BAI L, SHANG J, et al. Preliminary clinical results for PET/MR compared with PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Oncol Rep, 2020,43(1): 177-187
    [14] [13] FLYGARE L, ERDOGAN S T, SODERKVIST K. PET/MR versus PET/CT for locoregional staging of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer[J]. Acta Radiol, 2023,64(5): 1865-1872
    [15] [14] KUHN F P, HULLNER M, MADER C E, et al. Contrast-enhanced PET/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed?[J]. J Nucl Med, 2014,55(4): 551-558
    [16] [15] KAO J, LAVAF A, TENG M S, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and survival for patients with node-positive head and neck cancer: an analysis by primary site and nodal stage[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008,71(2): 362-370
    [17] [16] ZHANG Y, YU J, ZHU H. Risk factors for cervical lymph node metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective population-based study[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022,123(5): e484-e488
    [18] [17] ZHANG D, LI L. Risk factors and prognostic models of lymph node metastatic hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2023,280(11): 5019-5029
    [19] [18] van STAALDUINEN E K, MATTHEWS R, KHAN A, et al. Improved Cervical Lymph Node Characterization among Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using MR Texture Analysis Compared to Traditional FDG-PET/MR Features Alone[J]. Diagnostics, 2024,14(1): 71
    [20] [19] CEBECI S, AYDOS U, YENICERI A, et al. Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/MRI for cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically N0 head and neck cancer[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2023,27(10): 4528-4535
    [21] [20] CHIESA-ESTOMBA C M, LECHIEN J R, AYAD T, et al. Clinical and histopathological risk factors for distant metastasis in head and neck cancer patients[J]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2021,41(1): 6-17
    [22] [21] JAIN S, TAKALKAR A M, HALL L T. Molecular Imaging of Head and Neck Cancers[J]. 2023
    [23] [22] MIRSHAHVALAD S A, KOHAN A, METSER U, et al. Diagnostic performance of whole-body [(18)F]FDG PET/MR in cancer M staging: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2024,34(1): 673-685
    [24] [23] PIAO Y, CAO C, XU Y, et al. Detection and staging of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of FDG PET/MR[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2022,279(1): 353-359
    [25] [24] YEH C H, CHAN S C, LIN C Y, et al. Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of synchronous cancers and distant metastases in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2020,47(1): 94-104
    [26] [25] COCA-PELAZ A, RODRIGO J P, SUAREZ C, et al. The risk of second primary tumors in head and neck cancer: A systematic review[J]. Head Neck, 2020,42(3): 456-466
    [27] [26] NG S P, POLLARD C R, KAMAL M, et al. Risk of second primary malignancies in head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy[J]. NPJ Precis Oncol, 2019,3: 22
    [28] [27] DAHLSGAARD-WALLENIUS S E, HILDEBRANDT M G, JOHANSEN A, et al. Hybrid PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lung nodules-a literature review[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021,48(2): 584-591
    [29] [28] RAAD R A, FRIEDMAN K P, HEACOCK L, et al. Outcome of small lung nodules missed on hybrid PET/MRI in patients with primary malignancy[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016,43(2): 504-511
    [30] [29] ZENG F, NOGAMI M, UENO Y R, et al. Diagnostic performance of zero-TE lung MR imaging in FDG PET/MRI for pulmonary malignancies[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020,30(9): 4995-5003
    [31] [30] SEKINE T, BARBOSA F G, SAH B R, et al. PET/MR Outperforms PET/CT in Suspected Occult Tumors[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2017,42(2): e88-e95
    [32] [31] WANGARYATTAWANICH P, AGARWAL M, RATH T J. PET/CT and PET/MRI Evaluation of Post-treatment Head and Neck[J]. Semin Roentgenol, 2023,58(3): 331-346
    [33] [32] KIM E S, YOON D Y, MOON J Y, et al. Detection of loco-regional recurrence in malignant head and neck tumors: a comparison of CT, MRI, and FDG PET-CT[J]. Acta Radiol, 2019,60(2): 186-195
    [34] [33] PATEL L D, BRIDGHAM K, CIRIELLO J, et al. PET/MR Imaging in Evaluating Treatment Failure of Head and Neck Malignancies: A Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System-Based Study[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2022,43(3): 435-441
    [35] [34] HOFFMAN R M. L-[Methyl-(11)C] Methionine-Positron-Emission Tomography (MET-PET)[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2019,1866: 267-271
    [36] [35] PACE L, NICOLAI E, CAVALIERE C, et al. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in patients with advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2021,35(4): 479-484
    [37] [36] KULANTHAIVELU R, KOHAN A, HINZPETER R, et al. Prognostic value of PET/CT and MR-based baseline radiomics among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Front Oncol, 2022,12: 952763
    [38] [37] HUANG C, ZHANG L, MENG Z, et al. Prognostic Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2022,46(6): 968-977
    [39] [38] CHAN S, YEH C, NG S, et al. Prospective Investigation of 18FDG-PET/MRI with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Assess Survival in Patients with Oropharyngeal or Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma[J]. Cancers, 2022,14(24): 6104
    [40] [39] RASMUSSEN J H, NORGAARD M, HANSEN A E, et al. Feasibility of Multiparametric Imaging with PET/MR in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma[J]. J Nucl Med, 2017,58(1): 69-74
    [41] [40] SAMOLYK-KOGACZEWSKA N, SIERKO E, ZUZDA K, et al. PET/MRI-guided GTV delineation during radiotherapy planning in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2019,195(9): 780-791
    [42] [41] SATO J, KITAGAWA Y, WATANABE S, et al. (18)F-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography (FMISO-PET) may reflect hypoxia and cell proliferation activity in oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2017,124(3): 261-270
    [43] [42] CARLES M, FECHTER T, GROSU A L, et al. 18F-FMISO-PET Hypoxia Monitoring for Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: Radiomics Analyses Predict the Outcome of Chemo-Radiotherapy[J]. Cancers, 2021,13(14): 3449
    [44] [43] IMAIZUMI A, OBATA T, KERSHAW J, et al. Imaging of Hypoxic Tumor: Correlation between Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and (18)F-fluoroazomycin Arabinoside Positron Emission Tomography in Head and Neck Carcinoma[J]. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2020,19(3): 276-281
    [45] [44] WACK L J, MONNICH D, van ELMPT W, et al. Comparison of [18F]-FMISO, [18F]-FAZA and [18F]-HX4 for PET imaging of hypoxia--a simulation study[J]. Acta Oncol, 2015,54(9): 1370-1377
    [46] [45] SANDULEANU S, HAMMING-VRIEZE O, WESSELING F, et al. [(18)F]-HX4 PET/CT hypoxia in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with chemoradiotherapy: Prognostic results from two prospective trials[J]. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol, 2020,23: 9-15
    [47] [46] PELTANOVA B, RAUDENSKA M, MASARIK M. Effect of tumor microenvironment on pathogenesis of the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review[J]. Mol Cancer, 2019,18(1): 63
    [48] [47] XIE C, JI N, TANG Z, et al. The role of extracellular vesicles from different origin in the microenvironment of head and neck cancers[J]. Mol Cancer, 2019,18(1): 83
    [49] [48] JIANG Y, WEN B, LI C, et al. The performance of (68)Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective comparison with (18)F-FDG PET/CT[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2023,50(7): 2114-2126
    [50] [49] WEDMAN J, PRUIM J, van der PUTTEN L, et al. Is C-11 Methionine PET an alternative to 18-F FDG-PET for identifying recurrent laryngeal cancer after radiotherapy?[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2019,44(2): 124-130
    [51] [50] de BOER J R, van der LAAN B F, PRUIM J, et al. Carbon-11 tyrosine PET for visualization and protein synthesis rate assessment of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2002,29(9): 1182-1187
    [52] [51] KAZMIERSKA J, CHOLEWINSKI W, PIOTROWSKI T, et al. Assessment of tumour hypoxia, proliferation and glucose metabolism in head and neck cancer before and during treatment[J]. Br J Radiol, 2020,93(1106): 20180781
    [53] [52] CEGLA P, KAZMIERSKA J, GWOZDZ S, et al. Assessment of biological parameters in head and neck cancer based on in vivo distribution of (18)F-FDG-FLT-FMISO-PET/CT images[J]. Tumori, 2020,106(1): 33-38
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-20
  • 最后修改日期:2024-04-16
  • 录用日期:2024-10-14
关闭