肝右后叶血管瘤腹腔镜下剥除术与解剖性切除术治疗临床疗效对比
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学附属苏州医院/苏州市立医院 肝胆外科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

苏州市“科教兴卫”青年科技项目(KJXW2023040);苏州市临床医学中心建设项目(Szlcyxzxj202107);苏州市基础研究计划-医学应用基础研究(SKYD2023141)


Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Laparoscopic Enucleation and Anatomic Resection for Right Posterior Lobe Hepatic HemangiomasJIANG Hanlin, NIU Weiqiao, JIANG Zongying, YANG Guang, WU Jianwu, HUANG Lining, JIANG Xinwei
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Suzhou Municipal Hospital,Nanjing Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的:比较肝右后叶血管瘤腹腔镜下剥除术与解剖性切除术两种术式处理肝血管瘤(Hepatichemangioma,HH)的近期疗效效果。方法:选取2020年1月-2024年8月我院诊治的肝右后叶血管瘤患者58例,将病例按照术式不同,分为接受腹腔镜下肝血管瘤剥除术治疗的28例,接受腹腔镜下解剖性肝切除术治疗的30例。观察患者围术期的各项指标。结果:两组患者术前资料差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。剥除术组的手术时长、术中出血量和术后总引流量分别为(158.9±25.0)min、(306.4±81.5)mL和(422.4±100.0)mL,均显著短于或低于切除组【分别为(189.6±66.8)min、(378.8±154.5)mL和(732.5±318.0)mL,P<0.05】;在术后第一天,剥除组血清天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(Aspartate Aminotransferase,AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(Alanine Aminotransferase,ALT)和总胆红素(Total Bilirubin,TBIL)水平分别为(356.4±70.8)U/L、(369.1±22.2)U/L和(21.6±4.1)μmol/L,均显著低于切除组【分别为(392.8±55.1)U/L、(405.5±35.9)U/L和(25.9±6.8)μmol/L,P<0.05】;术后两组炎症指标差异比较均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:采取腹腔镜下肝右后叶血管瘤剥除术与解剖性切除术治疗肝右后叶血管瘤均为有效的手术方案,但血管瘤剥除术更有利于缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量和术后总引流量,且对患者术后第一天的肝功能影响较小。因此,选择手术方案应根据临床实际情况。

    Abstract:

    Objective: Comparison of short-term efficacy of laparoscopic enucleation versus anatomical resection for hepatic hemangiomas in the right posterior lobe. Methods: A total of 58 patients with hepatic hemangiomas in the right posterior lobe were selected from our hospital between January 2020 and August 2024. The cases were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: 28 patients underwent laparoscopic enucleation of the hepatic hemangioma, and 30 patients underwent laparoscopic anatomical resection. Various perioperative indicators were observed. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative data between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The enucleation group had a significantly shorter surgical duration [(158.9 ± 25.0) min vs. (189.6 ± 66.8) min, P < 0.05], less intraoperative blood loss [(306.4 ± 81.5) mL vs. (378.8 ± 154.5) mL, P < 0.05], and lower total postoperative drainage volume [(422.4 ± 100.0) mL vs. (732.5 ± 318.0) mL, P < 0.05]. On the first postoperative day, the serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) [(356.4 ± 70.8) U/L vs. (392.8 ± 55.1) U/L, P < 0.05], alanine aminotransferase (ALT) [(369.1 ± 22.2) U/L vs. (405.5 ± 35.9) U/L, P < 0.05], and total bilirubin (TBIL) [(21.6 ± 4.1) μmol/L vs. (25.9 ± 6.8) μmol/L, P < 0.05] in the enucleation group were significantly lower than those in the resection group. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative inflammatory markers (P > 0.05) or the overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both laparoscopic enucleation and anatomical resection are effective surgical options for treating hepatic hemangiomas in the right posterior lobe. However, laparoscopic enucleation offers advantages such as reduced surgical time, less intraoperative blood loss, and lower total postoperative drainage volume, along with a lesser impact on liver function on the first postoperative day. Therefore, the choice of surgical approach should be guided by individual clinical circumstances.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-11
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-06
  • 录用日期:2025-05-19
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
关闭