衰弱与老年冠脉综合征严重程度的相关性及危险因素分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京医科大学第一附属医院老年心内科;2.南京医科大学第一附属医院心内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

江苏省重点研发计划社会发展项目(BE2023818);江苏省老年健康科研项目(LKZ2023001);江苏省人民医院临床能力提升工程项目(JSPH-MB-2022-13)


Correlation between frailty and severity of coronary syndrome in elderly patients
Author:
Affiliation:

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨衰弱状态与老年冠脉综合征患者病情严重程度的相关性,分析老年冠脉综合征人群危险因素。 方法 本研究为分析性横断面研究,选取2023年9月至2024年9月于南京医科大学第一附属医院诊断冠脉综合征后,行冠状动脉(简称冠脉)造影及介入治疗的老年患者187例。根据FRAIL量表分为无衰弱组、衰弱前期组、衰弱组。使用Gensini评分,评估冠脉病变严重程度。所有患者行超声心动图检查,评估心脏结构与功能。根据三分位数法,将>43分定义为高Gensini评分,在此基础上采用先单因素筛查,后多因素回归模型明确危险因素。使用限制性立方样条对危险因素进行非线性检验。 结果 纳入研究对象中无衰弱组74例、衰弱前期组72例,衰弱组41例,衰弱前期组与衰弱组平均年龄偏高,NYHA心功能Ⅲ级比例升高(P<0.05)。心房颤动和低肾小球滤过率在衰弱组与衰弱前期组均高于无衰弱组(P<0.05)。衰弱组和衰弱前期组高Gensini评分发生率高于无衰弱组(36.6% vs 33.3% vs 20.3%),但组间比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。无衰弱组、衰弱前期组、衰弱组,左房内径逐渐增宽(36mm vs 38mm vs 40mm,P<0.05),左室舒张内径,衰弱前期组较无衰弱组增宽(50mm vs 47.5mm,P<0.05)。节段室壁运动障碍发生率,衰弱组(24.4%)和衰弱前期组(38.9%)高于无衰弱组(17.6%,P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示:高血压、糖尿病、空腹血糖、存在节段室壁运动障碍与老年冠脉综合征患者高Gensini评分呈正相关(P均<0.05)。而体质指数(Body mass index,BMI)呈负相关(OR=0.872,95%CI:0.775~0.980,P=0.021)。Spearman相关性分析示:BMI与Gensini评分成较弱负性相关(相关系数R=-0.161,P=0.028)。限制性立方样条分析示:所有研究对象以及衰弱、衰弱前期亚组,其BMI与Gensini评分均无显著非线性关系(P>0.05)。 结论 衰弱与老年冠脉综合征冠脉病变严重程度未见明显相关,但衰弱及衰弱前期更易发生心脏结构异常与搏动功能减弱。

    Abstract:

    [Abstract] Objective:To investigate the correlation between frailty status and disease severity in elderly patients with coronary artery syndrome (CAS) and analyze risk factors in this population. Methods:This analytical cross-sectional study included 187 elderly patients diagnosed with CAS at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from September 2023 to September 2024, who underwent coronary angiography and intervention. Participants were categorized into non-frail, pre-frail, and frail groups using the FRAIL Scale. Coronary lesion severity was assessed using the Gensini score, and cardiac structure/function was evaluated via echocardiography. A Gensini score >43 (defined by the tertile method) was classified as high. Risk factors were screened using univariate analysis and further analyzed via multivariate logistic regression. Restricted cubic splines were applied to test nonlinear relationships. Results : The cohort comprised 74 non-frailty, 72 pre-frailty, and 41 frailty cases. Pre-frailty and frailty groups had higher mean ages and increased proportions of NYHA class III cardiac function (P<0.05). Atrial fibrillation and low glomerular filtration rates were more prevalent in frailty and pre-frailty groups compared to non-frailty (P<0.05). High Gensini scores occurred more frequently in frailty (36.6%) and pre-frailty (33.3%) groups than in non-frailty (20.3%), though differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Left atrial diameter progressively increased across non-frailty (36 mm), pre-frailty (38 mm), and frailty (40 mm) groups (P<0.05). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was larger in pre-frailty (50 mm) versus non-frailty (47.5 mm, P<0.05). Segmental wall motion abnormalities were higher in frailty (24.4%) and pre-frailty (38.9%) groups than in non-frailty (17.6%, P<0.05). Logistic regression identified hypertension, diabetes, fasting glucose, and segmental wall motion abnormalities as positively correlated with high Gensini scores (all P<0.05), while BMI showed a negative correlation (OR=0.872, 95% CI: 0.775–0.980, P=0.021). Spearman analysis revealed a weak negative correlation between BMI and Gensini scores (R=-0.161, P=0.028). Restricted cubic splines indicated no significant nonlinear relationships between BMI and Gensini scores overall or within frailty subgroups (P>0.05). Conclusion :Frailty status was not significantly associated with coronary lesion severity in elderly patients with coronary syndrome. However, frailty and pre-frailty were linked to increased cardiac structural abnormalities and impaired contractile function.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-22
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-29
  • 录用日期:2025-07-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
关闭