腹膜透析后包裹性腹膜硬化的CT影像学特征
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学第一附属医院江苏省人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Radiological CT Characteristics of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis of Peritoneal Dialysis patients
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:包裹性腹膜硬化(encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, EPS)是长期腹膜透析(peritoneal dialysis, PD)患者少见但非常严重的并发症。但目前没有精确的诊断指标,本研究拟分析行腹膜透析后出现包裹性腹膜硬化的CT影像学特征,以期探寻其敏感的诊断、预后指标。 方法:纳入2022年1月至2024年12月期间于我院肾内科进行腹膜透析后出现包裹性腹膜硬化的18例患者,根据患者疾病的轻重进行分组,其中轻症包裹性腹膜硬化的8例患者作为轻症组,重症包裹性腹膜硬化 的10例患者作为重症组,比较两组患者的临床及CT影像学特征:包括腹膜钙化、腹膜增厚、肠壁增厚、小肠粘连、包裹性积液、小肠扩张;腹部四分象限,每个象限测量两次腹膜厚度、腹膜CT值、小肠壁厚度及小肠壁CT值。 结果:重症组包裹性腹膜硬化患者的腹膜透析龄大于轻症组(156.8±57.0 vs 87.4±60.4月, P=0.024),血性腹水比例更高(60.0% vs 0.0%, P=0.013),血镁水平更高(0.9±0.1 vs 0.8±0.2 mmol/L, P<0.001)。CT影像学特征方面,两组的腹膜钙化、腹膜增厚、肠壁增厚、小肠粘连、包裹性积液及小肠扩张情况无统计学差异。重症组包裹性腹膜硬化患者的腹膜厚度平均值(3.8±0.7 vs 2.8±0.7 mm, P=0.009)及腹膜CT值(30.4±7.9 vs 16.6±6.3, P=0.001)平均值大于轻症组。重症组治疗应用他莫昔芬更多(70.0% vs 12.5%, P=0.025)。 结论 腹膜透析后出现包裹性腹膜硬化具有一定CT影像学特征,CT的腹膜厚度及腹膜CT值可能是此病严重程度甚至是否发生的重要指标。

    Abstract:

    Objective: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare but severe complication in maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, precise diagnostic indicators are currently lacking. This study aimed to analyze the CT radiological characteristics of patients developing EPS after PD to identify sensitive diagnostic and prognostic indicators. Methods: A total of 18 patients who developed EPS after PD at our hospital's Department of Nephrology between January 2022 and December 2024 were enrolled. Patients were categorized based on disease severity: 8 patients with mild EPS constituted the mild group, and 10 patients with severe EPS constituted the severe group. Clinical and CT radiological characteristics were compared between the two groups, including the presence of peritoneal calcification, peritoneal thickening, bowel wall thickening, small bowel adhesions, encapsulated fluid, and small bowel dilatation. The peritoneal thickness, peritoneal CT value, small bowel wall thickness, and small bowel wall CT value were measured twice in each of the four abdominal quadrants. Results: The PD vintage was significantly longer in the severe EPS group compared to the mild group (156.8 ± 57.0 vs. 87.4 ± 60.4 months, P = 0.024). The proportion of hemorrhagic ascites was higher in the severe group (60.0% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.013), as was the serum magnesium level (0.9 ± 0.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.2 mmol/L, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the prevalence of peritoneal calcification, peritoneal thickening, bowel wall thickening, small bowel adhesions, encapsulated fluid, or small bowel dilatation. However, the mean peritoneal thickness (3.8 ± 0.7 vs. 2.8 ± 0.7 mm, P = 0.009) and the mean peritoneal CT value (30.4 ± 7.9 vs. 16.6 ± 6.3, P = 0.001) were significantly greater in the severe EPS group compared to the mild group. Tamoxifen was used more frequently for treatment in the severe group (70.0% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.025). Conclusion: EPS following PD exhibits specific CT radiological characteristics. Peritoneal thickness and peritoneal CT value derived from CT imaging may serve as important indicators for both the severity and potentially the occurrence of this disease.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-09
  • 最后修改日期:2026-05-10
  • 录用日期:2026-10-10
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
关闭