CT平扫ASPECTS与CT灌注成像梗死核心体积不匹配的影响因素分析
作者:
作者单位:

1. 南通大学附属丹阳医院(丹阳市人民医院)放射科,江苏 镇江 212300 ;2. 南京医科大学第一附属医院放射科,江苏 南京 210029 ;3. 南京医科大学第一附属医院介入放射科,江苏 南京 210029

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R814.42

基金项目:


Influencing factors for the mismatch between ASPECTS on non-contrast CT and infarct core volume on CT perfusion
Author:
Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Danyang Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University(the People’s Hospital of Danyang), Zhenjiang 212300 ;2. Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029 , China ;3. Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨急性缺血性脑卒中(acute ischemic stroke,AIS)患者 CT 平扫(non-contrast computed tomography,NCCT)Alberta卒中项目早期CT评分(Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score,ASPECTS)与CT灌注成像(CT perfusion,CTP)梗死核心体积不匹配的影响因素及预后特征。方法:回顾性分析2019年10月—2023年8月449例行NCCT及CTP评估的前循环大血管闭塞型AIS患者的临床及影像资料。采用RAPID软件自动计算NCCT-ASPECTS和CTP梗死核心体积。“NCCT-CTP不匹配”定义为低NCCT-ASPECTS、小梗死核心体积(low ASPECTS and small ischemic core volume,LASC)(NCCT-ASPECTS<6分,CTP 梗死核心体积<70 mL)以及高 NCCT-ASPECTS、大梗死核心体积(high ASPECTS and large ischemic core volume,HALC)(NCCT-ASPECTS≥6分,CTP梗死核心体积≥70 mL)。采用血管内取栓治疗(endovascular thrombectomy,EVT)后90 d随访基线改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分0~2分定义预后良好。采用多因素逻辑回归分析NCCT-CTP不匹配的独立影响因素。结果:449例AIS患者中有145例出现NCCT-CTP不匹配,其中52例(35.9%)患者血管内取栓治疗(endovascular thrombectomy,EVT)后获得良好预后。多因素逻辑回归分析结果提示,影像评估前接受静脉溶栓(intravenous thrombolysis,IVT)(OR=1.833;95%CI:1.205~2.790,P=0.005)、更高的基线NIHSS评分(OR=1.055;95%CI:1.028~1.083,P<0.001)是AIS患者出现NCCT-CTP不匹配的独立影响因素。NCCT-CTP不匹配亚组分析提示,LASC患者卒中发病至基线影像检查的时间间隔大于HALC患者[306(219,482)min vs. 125(63,307)min;P=0.004]。LASC 患者 EVT 术后出血性脑梗死发生率高于 HALC 患者(66.9% vs. 33.3%;P=0.021)。结论:约35%的NCCT-CTP 不匹配患者可从EVT 中获益。影像评估前接受IVT 以及更高的基线NIHSS 评分是出现NCCT-CTP不匹配的独立影响因素。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To assess the influencing factors and the prognostic characteristics for the mismatch between Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score(ASPECTS)on non-contrast computed tomography(NCCT)and infarct core volume on CT perfusion(CTP)imaging in acute ischemic stroke(AIS)patients. Methods:The clinical and imaging data of 449 AIS patients with large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation who underwent NCCT and CTP evaluation from October 2019 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The RAPID software was used to automatically calculate the NCCT-ASPECTS and the infarct core volume of CTP.“NCCT -CTP mismatch”was defined as low ASPECTS with small ischemic core(LASC,ASPECTS< 6 points,CTP infarct corevolume< 70 mL)and high ASPECTS with large ischemic core(HALC,ASPECTS≥6 points,CTP infarct core volume≥70 mL). A modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score of 0-2 at 90-day follow-up after endovascular thrombectomy(EVT)was defined as good prognosis.The multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to assess the independent influencing factors for NCCT - CTP mismatch.Results:Among the 449 AIS patients,145 patients had NCCT-CTP mismatch,and 52(35.9%)NCCT-CTP mismatch patients achieved good outcomes after EVT. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that intravenous thrombolysis(IVT)before imaging assessment(OR=1.833;95%CI:1.205-2.790,P=0.005)and higher baseline NIHSS score(OR=1.055;95%CI:1.028-1.083,P<0.001)were independent influencing factors for NCCT -CTP mismatch in AIS patients. In the subgroup analysis for NCCT -CTP mismatch patients,patients with LASC exhibited longer stroke onset time[306(219,482)min vs. 125(63,307)min,P=0.004]and a higher rate of hemorrhagic infarction(66.9% vs. 33.3%,P=0.021)after EVT than patients with HALC. Conclusions:About 35% NCCT-CTP mismatch AIS patients can benefit from EVT. The IVT using before baseline imaging and a higher admission NIHSS score were independent influencing factors for NCCT-CTP mismatch.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张强,褚玥,马高,沈咣辰,施海彬,吴飞云. CT平扫ASPECTS与CT灌注成像梗死核心体积不匹配的影响因素分析[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2026,(2):181-187

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-15
  • 出版日期:
关闭