文章摘要
赵西巨.是否违反“知情同意”法则是医学判断吗?[J].南京医科大学学报,2009,29(3):212~216
是否违反“知情同意”法则是医学判断吗?
Breach of the doctrine of informed consent:medical judgment?
投稿时间:2009-02-18  
DOI:10.7655
中文关键词: 知情同意  过失  医学判断
英文关键词: informed consent  negligence  medical judgment
基金项目:
作者单位
赵西巨 新西兰奥塔哥大学法学院,新西兰 但尼丁
山东中医药大学人文社科学院,山东 济南 250014 
摘要点击次数: 1674
全文下载次数: 198
中文摘要:
      在传统的医疗过失侵权诉讼中,为了体现行外人士对医疗这一专家型行业的尊重,医学判断在诉讼中发挥着重要的甚至决定性的作用?知情同意诉讼,虽被归入医疗过失侵权诉讼,却提供了一个不同于传统的医疗领域——诊断治疗——的情景?知情同意的独特性改变了医学判断在诉讼中的格局?以患者为取向的信息披露标准的建立意味着法律的关注点已从“专家”整体转移到“患者”;对“医学判断”所管辖领域的精细分割也说明,医学判断只应在证明医疗信息的感知和启用“医疗特权”上有应用价值,医疗信息的实质性判断已让位于一般人知识,而且对“医疗特权”的严
英文摘要:
      Under conventional medical negligence framework, as an indication of extraprofessional’s respect for medical profession, medical judgment has played an important, even decisive role in the lawsuit. Informed consent law provides a distinctive context, different from that of diagnosis and treatment. The patient-oriented standard of disclosure suggests that the focus of law has shifted from experts to patients. The analysis of medical judgment also indicates that medical judgment only has value in the context of appreciating medical information and invoking“therapeutic privilege”, the materiality of risk information is for layperson knowledge and human judgment. Careful definition of“therapeutic privilege” will inevitably further diminish the role of medical judgment.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器