Page 64 - 南京医科大学自然版
P. 64

第45卷第2期
               ·204 ·                            南 京    医 科 大 学 学         报                        2025年2月


              In the current study,patients with a poor prognosis had  kylosing spondylitis patients,an SII critical value of
              elevated NEU,decreased LYC,and consequently ele⁃  513.20 yielded a sensitivity of 86.84% and specificity
              vated NLR,consistent with previous studies [44- 48,50- 51] .  of 83.33% for diagnosing disease activity [27] . In the cur⁃
              The development of ILD is associated with the over⁃  rent study,the mean SII value for surviving patients
              activation of alveolar macrophages,which triggers  was 694.55,while for deceased patients,it was 1 278.43
              neutrophil activation and the release of lymphocyte  (P=0.001). SII was significantly associated with mor⁃
                                                                                 +
              chemotactic factors [52-53] ,further leading to an increase  tality in anti⁃MDA5 DM patients,with a cut⁃off value
              in NLR. For instance,in patients with systemic sclerosis,  above 895.79 indicating an increased risk of death.
                                                       [50]
              an NLR value higher than 2.59 helps predict ILD  ;in  Additionally,the current study showed that age was an
              polymyositis and dermatomyositis,NLR is significantly  independent risk factor for predicting mortality in anti⁃
                                                                      +
              correlated with the presence of ILD and serves as an  MDA5 DM,consistent with previous findings,which
                                               [54]
              independent predictor of its occurrence  . Therefore,  may be due to older patients having more comorbidi⁃
                                            [50]                                        [56-57]
              NLR is closely associated with ILD  . In the current  ties and overall poorer health  .
              study,the mean NLR value was 3.92 in non⁃RPILD         In summary,NLR and SII are valuable tools for
              patients and 6.74 in RPILD patients(P=0.003). After  clinicians in assessing disease severity,monitoring in⁃
              conducting an ROC curve analysis,the best cut ⁃ off  flammation,and predicting poor prognosis in anti ⁃
                                                                      +          [54]
              value for NLR in predicting RPILD was consistent with  MDA5 DM patients  . These parameters offer greater
              that of mortality,which was 6.12,indicating a strong  diagnostic and predictive accuracy than single indica⁃
              association with a fatal outcome,especially when com⁃  tors because they provide a more comprehensive as⁃
              bined with RPILD. Compared with recent studies,NLR  sessment of the inflammatory response. Although the
                                                                                       +
              higher than 4.86 was used as an independent predictor  exact cause of anti⁃MDA5 DM remains unknown,re⁃
                                                 +
              of mortality in patients with anti⁃MDA5 DM [14] . It is  cent studies have correlated disease prognosis with sev⁃
              worth noting that the optimal cut⁃off value may differ in  eral factors,including anti⁃MDA5 antibody titers,high
              other studies because of factors such as sample size  ferritin levels,serum KL⁃6,serum LDH levels,and the
                                                                               +       +     [3,58-59]
              and analysis methods. Therefore,further research with  proportion of CD4 CXCR4 T cells  . Besides,stu⁃
              larger sample sizes and multi⁃center studies is neces⁃  dies have shown that peripheral LYC is correlated with
              sary to determine a more definitive prediction.   RPILD and is an applicable prognostic predictor for an⁃
                                                                        +
                  SII is a newly developed index that measures in⁃  ti⁃MDA5 DM [60] . Compared with these indicators,both
              flammation by combining peripheral lymphocytes,neu⁃  NLR and SII are simpler,faster,and more cost⁃effec⁃
              trophils,and platelets,providing a more comprehen⁃  tive,making them particularly useful for dynamic moni⁃
              sive assessment of inflammation and immune balance  toring in clinical practice.
              in the body. SII can be used to evaluate disease activity  However,the current study has several limitations.
              and predict adverse outcomes. From a pathophysiologi⁃  Firstly,the follow⁃up period for recently enrolled pa⁃
              cal perspective,inflammation leads to an increase in  tients was relatively short,which may introduce some
              neutrophil and platelet counts as well as a decrease in  bias. Secondly,because of the rarity of the disease,the
              lymphocyte counts,which results in higher SII values  sample size was relatively small. Thirdly,the study was
              that indicate stronger inflammatory responses and  limited to a single center,and future multicenter stud⁃
                                   [55]
              weaker immune responses  . In the assessment of can⁃  ies are needed to validate the results. Lastly,lympho⁃
              cer,an elevated SII is significantly associated with lower  cyte,neutrophil,and platelet counts may be influenced
              survival rates,and the median critical value for SII was  by treatment regimens;however,most cases in the
              572 [37] ,with a value above 600 serving as a clinical  study had received steroid treatment,making it diffi⁃
                                  [50]
              marker of inflammation  . Studies have shown that  cult to exclude this factor. Prospective studies are nec⁃
              when the critical value exceeds 578.25,there is a sig⁃  essary to evaluate changes in NLR and SII at different
                                                   [25]
              nificant increase in the risk of developing RA  . In an⁃  disease stages. Future efforts should focus on design⁃
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69