Page 131 - 南京医科大学自然版
P. 131

第44卷第7期                   许馨晨,顾莹莹,唐立钧. 影像组学在前列腺癌中的研究进展[J].
                  2024年7月                     南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2024,44(7):1010-1017                      ·1015 ·


               [13]QI Y F,ZHANG S T,WEI J W,et al. Multiparametric MRI⁃  (2):243-262
                    based radiomics for prostate cancer screening with PSA in  [24]KENDRICK J,FRANCIS R,HASSAN G M,et al. Ra⁃
                    4⁃10 ng/mL to reduce unnecessary biopsies[J]. J Magn  diomics for identification and prediction in metastatic
                    Reson Imaging,2020,51(6):1890-1899                 prostate cancer:a review of studies[J]. Front Oncol,
               [14]李梦娟,张彩元,赵文露,等. 基于双参数MRI的影像组                         2021,11:771787
                    学模型在临床显著性前列腺癌中的诊断价值探讨[J].                    [25]SHANKAR P R,KAZA R K,AL⁃HAWARY M M,et al.
                    磁共振成像,2022,13(11):76-81                            Impact of clinical history on maximum PI⁃RADS version
               [15]CHEN T,ZHANG Z Y,TAN S X,et al. MRI based ra⁃       2 score:a six⁃reader 120⁃case sham history retrospective
                    diomics compared with the PI⁃RADS V 2.1 in the prediction  evaluation[J]. Radiology,2018,288(1):158-163
                    of clinically significant prostate cancer:biparametric vs  [26]GONG L X,XU M,FANG M J,et al. Noninvasive predic⁃
                    multiparametric MRI[J]. Front Oncol,2021,11:792456  tion of high⁃grade prostate cancer via biparametric MRI
               [16]BASS E J,PANTOVIC A,CONNOR M,et al. A systematic    radiomics[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2020,52(4):
                    review and meta⁃analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of  1102-1109
                    biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at  [27]WANG X C,ZHANG Y,JI Z G,et al. Old men with pros⁃
                    risk[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis,2021,24(3):596-  tate cancer have higher risk of gleason score upgrading
                    611                                                and pathological upstaging after initial diagnosis:a sys⁃
               [17]WOO S,SUH C H,KIM S Y,et al. Head⁃to⁃head compari⁃  tematic review and meta⁃analysis[J]. World J Surg On⁃
                    son between biparametric and multiparametric MRI for  col,2021,19(1):18
                    the diagnosis of prostate cancer:a systematic review and  [28]ZHANG G M,HAN Y Q,WEI J W,et al. Radiomics
                    meta⁃analysis[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2018,211(5):  based on MRI as a biomarker to guide therapy by predict⁃
                    W226-W241                                          ing upgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical
               [18]ALABOUSI M,SALAMEH J P,GUSENBAUER K,et al.          prostatectomy[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2020,52(4):
                    Biparametric vs multiparametric prostate magnetic reso⁃  1239-1248
                    nance imaging for the detection of prostate cancer in treat⁃  [29]OGBONNAYA C N,ZHANG X Y,ALSAEDI B S O,et al.
                    ment⁃naïve patients:a diagnostic test accuracy systematic  Prediction of clinically significant cancer using radiomics
                    review and meta ⁃ analysis[J]. BJU Int,2019,124(2):  features of pre⁃biopsy of multiparametric MRI in men sus⁃
                    209-220                                            pected of prostate cancer[J]. Cancers,2021,13(24):
               [19]BLEKER J,KWEE T C,DIERCKX R A J O,et al. Multi⁃     6199
                    parametric MRI and auto⁃fixed volume of interest⁃based  [30]MAKOWSKI M R ,BRESSEM K K ,FRANZ L ,et al.
                    radiomics signature for clinically significant peripheral  De novo radiomics approach using image augmentation
                    zone prostate cancer[J]. Eur Radiol,2020,30(3):1313-  and features from T1 mapping to predict gleason scores in
                    1324                                               prostate cancer[J]. Invest Radiol,2021,56(10):661-668
               [20]CASTILLO T J M,ARIF M,STARMANS M P A,et al.   [31]CASTILLO T J M,STARMANS M P A,ARIF M,et al. A
                    Classification of clinically significant prostate cancer on  multi⁃center,multi⁃vendor study to evaluate the generaliz⁃
                    multi⁃parametric MRI:a validation study comparing deep  ability of a radiomics model for classifying prostate can⁃
                    learning and radiomics[J]. Cancers,2021,14(1):12   cer:high grade vs.low grade[J]. Diagnostics,2021,11
               [21]MOSES K A,SPRENKLE P C,BAHLER C,et al. NCCN        (2):369
                            ®
                    guidelines insights:prostate cancer early detection,ver⁃  [32]ALBERTSEN P C. Radical prostatectomy or watchful wait⁃
                    sion 1.2023[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2023,21(3):  ing in prostate cancer⁃29⁃year follow⁃up[J]. Eur Urol,
                    236-246                                            2020,78(3):471
               [22]EPSTEIN J I,ZELEFSKY M J,SJOBERG D D,et al. A  [33]JEONG B C,CHALFIN H J,LEE S B,et al. The relation⁃
                    contemporary prostate cancer grading system:a validated  ship between the extent of extraprostatic extension and
                    alternative to the gleason score[J]. Eur Urol,2016,69  survival following radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol,
                   (3):428-435                                         2015,67(2):342-346
               [23]MOTTET N,VAN DEN BERGH R C N,BRIERS E,et al.  [34]LITWIN M S,TAN H J. The diagnosis and treatment of
                    EAU⁃EANM⁃ESTRO⁃ESUR⁃SIOG guidelines on prostate    prostate cancer:a review[J]. JAMA,2017,317(24):
                    cancer⁃2020 update.part 1:screening,diagnosis,and lo⁃  2532-2542
                    cal treatment with curative intent[J]. Eur Urol,2021,79  [35]ROOIJ M D,HAMOEN E H,WITJES J A,et al. Accuracy
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136