Page 55 - 南京医科大学社科版
P. 55

第6期 总第131期                           南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)京医科大学学报(社会科学版)                             ·
                                                    南
                 2025年12月                     Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)  · 581
                                              Journal
                    与社会发展,2025,31(4):26-45                            规制[J]. 政治与法律,2023(3):34-49
              [20]张伟珂. 食品安全行刑衔接机制的理论与实践[M]. 北                   [22]于增尊. 效率追求如何契合公正:刑事诉讼期限立法的
                    京:法律出版社,2017:168                                  基本原则[J]. 法学杂志,2019,40(5):112-121
              [21]自正法. 监察留置衔接为羁押措施的法理反思与程序                                                     (本文编辑:姜 鑫)





                  Practical dilemma and path optimization of procuratorate’s early

                             intervention in crimes involving infectious diseases

                    ——With the revision of the law on the prevention and control of infectious diseases as an opportunity
                                                            LI Zhe
                                        School of Law,Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230032,China
                   Abstract:With the number of criminal cases involving infectious diseases steadily increasing annually,

               the early intervention of procuratorates in the investigation phase of such cases in the criminal justice field
               responds to the promptness for infectious disease prevention and control,and also serves as an inherent
               measure of advancing the modernization of the national emergency management system and governance.
               However,procuratorates still face difficulties in their current early intervention in criminal cases involving
               infectious diseases,including unclear intervention mechanisms,insufficient technical support capabilities,and
               abnormal acceleration of procedures. To address these issues,it is necessary to strengthen legislative guarantees
               and clarify the specific standards for procuratorates’early intervention in such cases. Meanwhile,efforts should
               be made to enhance the level of procuratorates’early intervention from the dimensions of criminal charge
               application,evidence review,and the connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice.
               In addition,emphasis should be placed on protecting the rights of defense and the personal information of the
               defendant. These measures aim to promote the shift of procuratorates’role from a“passive responders”to
              “active governance”.
                   Key words:crimes involving infectious diseases;procuratorate;early intervention;risk prevention and
               control;human rights protection
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60