Page 11 - 南京医科大学自然版
P. 11
第44卷第11期 何晓鑫,高俊英,郭吉超,等. Bmi⁃1基因杂合子缺失对小鼠脑老化的影响[J].
2024年11月 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2024,44(11):1473-1482 ·1477 ·
A +/- B C +/- D
WT Bmi⁃1 50 WT Bmi⁃1 (mm) 0.5
(g) 40 0.4
Body weight 30 Thickness of skin 0.3
20
0.2
10
0 0.1 0
WT Bmi⁃1 +/- WT Bmi⁃1 +/-
E F G
Width of growth plate (μm) 90
WT Bmi⁃1 +/- WT Bmi⁃1 +/- 150
120
60
30
0
WT Bmi⁃1 +/-
H WT Bmi⁃1 +/- I WT Bmi⁃1 +/- J 0.5
0.4
Bone IOD 0.3
0.2
0.1
0
WT Bmi⁃1 +/-
+/-
+/-
A:Appearance of Bmi⁃1 and WT mice. B:Body weight of Bmi⁃1 and WT mice. C:HE staining of the skin showed cellular structures of Bmi⁃1 +/-
and WT mice. Scale bars=50 μm. D:The skin thickness of Bmi⁃1 +/- and WT mice. E:Masson staining of the skin showed the distribution of total colla⁃
+/-
gen in the skin of Bmi⁃1 and WT mice. Scale bars=50 μm. F:HE staining of long bones showing bone morphology and cellular architecture of Bmi⁃1 +/-
and WT mice. Scale bars=100 μm. G:Comparison of bone growth plate thicknesses between Bmi⁃1 +/- and WT mice. H:Masson staining of long bones
showing total collagen expression in bone of Bmi⁃1 +/- and WT mice. Scale bars=200 μm. I:X⁃ray of long bones of Bmi⁃1 +/- and WT mice. J:X⁃ray mea⁃
+/-
surement of optical density in long bones of of Bmi⁃1 and WT mice,showing the size of bone density(n=4).
+/-
图1 Bmi⁃1 小鼠与WT小鼠的体重、外貌、皮肤及骨骼分析比较
Figure 1 Comparisons of body weight、appearance、skin、and skeletal analysis between the Bmi⁃1 and WT mice
+/-
A B C D
70 24 50 WT 180 WT
(g) 60 20 (sec) 40 Bmi⁃1 +/- (mm/sec) 150 Bmi⁃1 +/-
50
Alternation 40 Number of arm entries 12 8 Latency 20 * * Speed 90
120
16
30
30
60
20
10
10
0 4 0 0 .. 20 0 ..
WT Bmi⁃1 +/- WT Bmi⁃1 +/- 1 d 2 d 1 d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 d 1 d 2 d 1 d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 d
E F
40 20
(sec) 30 * 15 *
Duration 20 Number of crossing 10 5
10
0 0
WT Bmi⁃1 +/- WT Bmi⁃1 +/-
+/-
A:Comparison of the proportions of alternation in Y⁃maze test between the Bmi⁃1 mice and WT mice. B:Comparison of the number of arm entries
+/-
+/-
between the Bmi⁃1 mice and WT mice. C:Comparison of the latency between the Bmi⁃1 mice and WT mice in finding target quadrant platform under
+/⁃
both visual and non⁃visual platform condition. D:Comparison of the swimming speed between the Bmi⁃1 mice and WT mice. E:Comparison of the dura⁃
+/⁃
tion time between the Bmi⁃1 mice and WT mice in the target quadrant without platform at the next day after non⁃visual platform training. F:Compari⁃
*
+/-
son of the platform crossing times between the Bmi⁃1 mice and WT mice. Compared with the WT mice,P < 0.05(n=7).
图2 Bmi⁃1 小鼠学习记忆行为学分析
+/-
Figure 2 Behavioural analysis of learning memory in Bmi⁃1 mice
+/-