Page 145 - 南京医科大学自然版
P. 145

第44卷第7期                  高钟秀,顾莹莹,唐立钧. MRI定量技术在前列腺癌中的研究进展[J].
                  2024年7月                     南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2024,44(7):1025-1030                      ·1029 ·


               [10] NEZZO M,DI TRANI M G,CAPORALE A,et al. Mean       Radiology,2011,259(3):775-784
                     diffusivity discriminates between prostate cancer with  [23]VERMA S,RAJESH A,MORALES H,et al. Assessment
                     grade group 1&2 and grade groups equal to or greater  of aggressiveness of prostate cancer:correlation of apparent
                     than 3[J]. Eur J Radiol,2016,85(10):1794-1801     diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical
               [11]LI L,MARGOLIS D J,DENG M,et al. Correlation of glea⁃  prostatectomy[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2011,196(2):
                    son scores with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imag⁃  374-381
                    ing in peripheral zone prostate cancer[J]. J Magn Reson  [24]HAMBROCK T,SOMFORD D M,HUISMAN H J,et al.
                    Imaging,2015,42(2):460-467                         Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at
               [12]MANENTI G,CARLANI M,MANCINO S,et al. Diffusion      3.0⁃T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone
                    tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer[J].  prostate cancer[J]. Radiology,2011,259(2):453-461
                    Invest Radiol,2007,42(6):412-419             [25] ROSENKRANTZ A B,SIGMUND E E,JOHNSON G,et
               [13]MUKHERJEE P,BERMAN J I,CHUNG S W,et al. Diffu⁃      al. Prostate cancer:feasibility and preliminary experience
                    sion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography:theoretic  of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assess⁃
                    underpinnings[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2008,29(4):  ment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer[J]. Ra⁃
                    632-641                                            diology,2012,264(1):126-135
               [14] AGARWAL H K,MERTAN F V,SANKINENI S,et al.    [26]SI Y,LIU R B. Diagnostic performance of monoexponen⁃
                     Optimal high b⁃value for diffusion weighted MRI in diag⁃  tial DWI versus diffusion kurtosis imaging in prostate
                     nosing high risk prostate cancers in the peripheral zone[J].  cancer:a systematic review and meta ⁃ analysis[J]. AJR
                     J Magn Reson Imaging,2017,45(1):125-131           Am J Roentgenol,2018,211(2):358-368
               [15]JONES D K. The effect of gradient sampling schemes on  [27]LE BIHAN D. What can we see with IVIM MRI?[J]. Neu⁃
                    measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI:a Monte Carlo  roimage,2019,187:56-67
                    study[J]. Magn Reson Med,2004,51(4):807-815  [28] IIMA M. Perfusion ⁃ driven intravoxel incoherent motion
               [16] GHOLIZADEH N,GREER P B,SIMPSON J,et al.           (IVIM)MRI in oncology:applications,challenges,and
                     Characterization of prostate cancer using diffusion tensor  future trends[J]. Magn Reson Med Sci,2021,20(2):
                     imaging:a new perspective[J]. Eur J Radiol,2019,110:  125-138
                     112-120                                     [29]LUCIANI A,VIGNAUD A,CAVET M,et al. Liver cirrhosis:
               [17]PUNDAVELA J,DEMONT Y,JOBLING P,et al. ProNGF        intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging ⁃ pilot study[J].
                    correlates with Gleason score and is a potential driver of  Radiology,2008,249(3):891-899
                    nerve infiltration in prostate cancer[J]. Am J Pathol,  [30] ZHANG J L,SIGMUND E E,CHANDARANA H,et al.
                    2014,184(12):3156-3162                             Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients:limita⁃
               [18]OLAR A,HE D,FLORENTIN D,et al. Biologic correlates  tions of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantifi⁃
                    and significance of axonogenesis in prostate cancer[J].  cation[J]. Radiology,2010,254(3):783-792
                    Hum Pathol,2014,45(7):1358-1364              [31]LEMKE A,LAUN F B,KLAUSS M,et al. Differentiation
               [19]ROSENKRANTZ A B,PADHANI A R,CHENEVERT T             of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using
                    L,et al. Body diffusion kurtosis imaging:basic principles,  multiple b⁃values:comparison of apparent diffusion coef⁃
                    applications,and considerations for clinical practice[J].  ficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parame⁃
                    J Magn Reson Imaging,2015,42(5):1190-1202          ters[J]. Invest Radiol,2009,44(12):769-775
               [20]ROETHKE M C,KUDER T A,KURU T H,et al. Evalua⁃  [32]PATEL P,WANG S,SIDDIQUI M M. The use of multipa⁃
                    tion of diffusion kurtosis imaging versus standard diffu⁃  rametric magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI)in the
                    sion imaging for detection and grading of peripheral zone  detection,evaluation,and surveillance of clinically signifi⁃
                    prostate cancer[J]. Invest Radiol,2015,50(8):483-489  cant prostate cancer(csPCa)[J]. Curr Urol Rep,2019,20
               [21]YAO W,ZHENG J,HAN C,et al. Integration of quantita⁃  (10):60
                    tive diffusion kurtosis imaging and prostate specific anti⁃  [33]YAO W,LIU J,ZHENG J,et al. Study on diagnostic
                    gen in differential diagnostic of prostate cancer[J]. Medi⁃  value of quantitative parameters of intravoxel incoherent
                    cine(Baltimore),2021,100(35):e27144                motion diffusion⁃weighted imaging(IVIM⁃DWI)in pros⁃
               [22]VARGAS H A,AKIN O,FRANIEL T,et al. Diffusion ⁃      tate cancer[J]. Am J Transl Res,2021,13(4):3696-
                    weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate can⁃  3702
                    cer:tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness[J].  [34]YANG D M,KIM H C,KIM S W,et al. Prostate cancer:
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150