Page 25 - 南京医科大学自然版
P. 25

第46卷第6期                 孙 庆,梁     迪,何 健. 肝转移瘤 F⁃FDG PET/CT研究进展与展望[J].
                                                                   18
                  2026年6月                      南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2026,46(6):799-808                      ·807  ·

                                  18
                    tumor volume from F⁃FDG PET/CT in combination with  ses[J]. Nucl Med Commun,2023,44(5):381-389
                    radiologic measurements to predict long⁃term survival fol⁃  [41]HAZHIRKARZAR B,KHOSHPOURI P,SHAGHAGHI
                    lowing transplantation for colorectal liver metastases[J].  M,et al. Current state of the art imaging approaches for
                    Cancers,2024,16(1):19                              colorectal liver metastasis[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr,
               [30]STERN N M,MIKALSEN L T G,DUELAND S,et al. The       2020,9(1):35-48
                                  18
                    prognostic value of F FDG PET/CT texture analysis prior  [42]LUND M,BJERRE T A,GRØNBÆK H,et al. CEUS com⁃
                    to transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metas⁃  pared with CECT,MRI,and FDG⁃PET/CT for diagnosing
                    tases[J]. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging,2025,45(1):   CRC liver metastases:a diagnostic test accuracy systemat⁃
                    e12908                                             ic review and meta⁃analysis[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol
               [31]DEL CARPIO L P,ALGARRA M A,SABATÉ⁃LLOBERA           Hepatol,2024,18(9):541-549
                    A,et al. Differences in glucose metabolic activity in liver  [43]TAHTABASI M,ERTURK S M,BASAK M. Comparison
                                                                                18
                    metastasis separates two groups of metastatic uveal mela⁃  of MRI and F ⁃ FDG PET/CT in the liver metastases of
                    noma patients with different prognosis[J]. Cancer Med,  gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary tumors[J]. Sisli Et⁃
                    2023,12(13):14062-14071                            fal Hastan Tip Bul,2021,55(1):12-17
               [32]INOUE D,OURA S. Eosinophilic variant of chromophobe  [44]OH J W,OH S N,CHOI J I,et al. Does the gadoxetic acid⁃
                    renal cell carcinoma metastasizing to the liver:diagnostic  enhanced liver MRI impact on the treatment of patients
                                                                                                          18
                    pitfall[J]. Radiol Case Rep,2023,18(10):3504-3508  with colorectal cancer? Comparison study with F ⁃ FDG
               [33]HWANG J Y,LEE J E,JUNG M J. A challenging case of   PET/CT[J]. Biomed Res Int,2016,2016:8412071
                    solitary necrotic nodules of the liver mimicking hepatic  [45]FÜLÖP A C,SERAC G,GURZU S. Detection of hepatic
                    metastases:CT,MRI,and PET ⁃ CT findings[J]. J Belg  metastasis in colorectal cancer:a comparative case report
                                                                        18
                    Soc Radiol,2020,104(1):16                          of F⁃FDG PET⁃CT and diffusion⁃weighted MRI with a b
                                                 18
               [34]LYU Q H,LIN D Y,TANG M D,et al. F⁃FDG PET/CT        value of 1000[J]. J Belg Soc Radiol,2023,107(1):52
                                                                                                    18
                    and MR imaging features of liver metastases in gastroin⁃  [46]SHI Y G,YU H X,ZHANG X Y,et al. F⁃FDG PET/CT
                                                                            18
                    testinal stromal tumors:a cross ⁃ sectional analysis[J].  versus F⁃FDG PET/MRI in the evaluation of liver metas⁃
                    Ann Transl Med,2022,10(22):1220                    tasis in patients with primary cancer:a head⁃to⁃head com⁃
               [35]BORELLO A,RUSSOLILLO N,LO TESORIERE R,et al.        parative meta ⁃ analysis[J]. Clin Imaging,2024,112:
                    Diagnostic performance of the FDG ⁃ PET/CT in patients  110209
                    with resected mucinous colorectal liver metastases[J].  [47]BEIDERWELLEN K,GERALDO L,RUHLMANN V,et
                                                                                   18
                    Surgeon,2021,19(5):e140-e145                       al. Accuracy of F FDG PET/MRI for the detection of
               [36]TSURUSAKI M,OKADA M,KURODA H,et al. Clinical        liver metastases[J]. PLoS One,2015,10(9):e0137285
                              18
                    application of F⁃fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission to⁃  [48]SINGNURKAR A,POON R,METSER U. Head⁃to⁃head
                    mography for assessment and evaluation after therapy for  comparison of the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT
                    malignant hepatic tumor[J]. J Gastroenterol,2014,49  and FDG PET/MRI in patients with cancer:a systematic
                   (1):46-56                                           review and meta ⁃ analysis[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,
               [37]AYAZ U Y,AYAZ S. SUVmax⁃to⁃HU ratio in diagnosis    2024,223(3):e2431519
                    of hepatic metastases of colon cancer on FDG PET/CT. A  [49]COHEN D,KESLER M,MUCHNIK KURASH M,et al. A
                    new semiquantitative parameter[J]. Ann Ital Chir,2023,  lesson in humility:the added values of PET⁃MRI over PET⁃
                    94:27-35                                           CT in detecting malignant hepatic lesions[J]. Eur J Nucl
               [38]CHICKLORE S,GOH V,SIDDIQUE M,et al. Quantifying     Med Mol Imaging,2023,50(5):1423-1433
                                      18
                    tumour heterogeneity in F⁃FDG PET/CT imaging by tex⁃  [50]AKKUS GUNDUZ P,OZKAN E,KURU OZ D,et al. Clini⁃
                    ture analysis[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2013,40  cal value of fluorine⁃18⁃fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI for
                   (1):133-140                                         liver metastasis in colorectal cancer :a prospective
               [39]HARTMANN L,BUNDSCHUH L,ZSÓTÉR N,et al. Tu⁃          study[J]. Nucl Med Commun,2023,44(2):150-160
                    mor heterogeneity for differentiation between liver tumors  [51]ZHOU N N,MENG X X,ZHANG Y,et al. Diagnostic value
                                       18
                    and normal liver tissue in F⁃FDG PET/CT[J]. Nuklear⁃  of delayed PET/MR in liver metastasis in comparison with
                    medizin,2021,60(1):25-32                           PET/CT[J]. Front Oncol,2021,11:717687
               [40]MISHRA A,RAVINA M,KOTE R,et al. Role of textural  [52]CHENG G,TORIGIAN D A,ZHUANG H M,et al. When
                    analysis parameters derived from FDG PET/CT in differ⁃  should we recommend use of dual time⁃point and delayed
                    entiating hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic metasta⁃  time ⁃ point imaging techniques in FDG PET?[J]. Eur J
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30