Page 144 - 南京医科大学自然版
P. 144

第46卷第7期
               ·1090 ·                           南 京    医 科 大 学 学         报                        2026年7月


                   Toward best practices in radiology reporting[J]. Radiolo⁃  creased interreader agreement in diagnosis of hepatocellu⁃
                   gy,2009,252(3):852-856                            lar carcinoma using an adapted LI⁃RADS algorithm[J].
             [33]KNIGHTLY D V,PLACE J N. Best practices in computeri⁃  Eur J Radiol,2017,86:33-40
                   zed tomography[J]. Radiol Manage,2010,32(1):16-23  [43]CHOI H H,KIM S,SHUM D J,et al. Assessing adherence
             [34]GRANATA V,DE MUZIO F,CUTOLO C,et al. Struc⁃         to US LI⁃RADS follow⁃up recommendations in vulnerable
                   tured reporting in radiological settings:pitfalls and per⁃  patients undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma surveil⁃
                   spectives[J]. J Pers Med,2022,12(8):1344          lance[J]. Radiol Imaging Cancer,2024,6(1):e230118
             [35]张紫欣,吕志彬,王宇新,等. LI⁃RADS 2018 版 MRI 辅            [44]BOSS M A,MALYARENKO D,PARTRIDGE S,et al. The
                   助征象在肝癌分类及预后评估中的应用[J]. 临床放射                        QIBA profile for diffusion⁃weighted MRI:apparent diffu⁃
                   学杂志,2024,43(5):858-861                            sion coefficient as a quantitative imaging biomarker[J].
                   ZHANG Z X,LV Z B,WANG Y X,et al. Application of LI⁃  Radiology,2024,313:e233055
                   RADS 2018 MRI ancillary features in hepatocellular car⁃  [45]RAUNIG D L,MCSHANE L M,PENNELLO G,et al.
                   cinoma classification and prognostic evaluation[J]. Jour⁃  Quantitative imaging biomarkers:a review of statistical
                   nal of Clinical Radiology,2024,43(5):858-861      methods for technical performance assessment[J]. Stat
             [36]AN J Y,UNSDORFER K M L,WEINREB J C. BI⁃RADS,        Methods Med Res,2015,24(1):27-67
                   C⁃RADS,CAD⁃RADS,LI⁃RADS,lung⁃RADS,NI⁃RADS,   [46]HAGIWARA A,FUJITA S,OHNO Y,et al. Variability
                   O⁃RADS,PI⁃RADS,TI⁃RADS:reporting and data sys⁃    and standardization of quantitative imaging:monoparamet⁃
                   tems[J]. RadioGraphics,2019,39(5):1435-1436       ric to multiparametric quantification,radiomics,and artifi⁃
             [37]唐雅伦,李      瑞,高    磊,等. 人工智能辅助诊断系统与                  cial intelligence[J]. Invest Radiol,2020,55(9):601-616
                   Lung⁃RADS 对不同临床特征肺结节的良恶性预测效                  [47]程   枫,艾慧俊,冯娅琴,等. 描述性标准化超声报告对
                   能[J]. 分子影像学杂志,2025,48(6):668-677                  甲状腺乳头状癌诊断的影响[J]. 现代实用医学,2018,
                   TANG Y L,LI R,GAO L,et al. Predictive performance of  30(11):1507-1509
                   an artificial intelligence ⁃ assisted diagnostic system and  CHENG F,AI H J,FENG Y Q,et al. Impact of descrip⁃
                   Lung ⁃ RADS for malignancy of pulmonary nodules with  tive standardized ultrasound reporting on the diagnosis of
                   different clinical characteristics[J]. Journal of Molecular  papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Modern Practical Medi⁃
                   Imaging,2025,48(6):668-677                        cine,2018,30(11):1507-1509
             [38]刘丹丹,韦       平,高   彦,等. 联合 Kaiser 评分、DWI 及      [48]LIN Y N,FU M Z,DING R W,et al. Patient adherence to
                   MRS 对乳腺 BI⁃RADS3⁃5 类病变的诊断效能[J]. 临床                lung CT screening reporting & data system⁃recommended
                   放射学杂志,2025,44(12):2290-2294                       screening intervals in the United States:a systematic re⁃
                   LIU D ,WEI P,GAO Y,et al. Diagnostic performance of  view and meta⁃analysis[J]. J Thorac Oncol,2022,17(1):
                   combined Kaiser Score,diffusion⁃weighted imaging,and  38-55
                   magnetic resonance spectroscopy for breast BI⁃RADS cat⁃  [49]LACSON R,WANG A J,COCHON L,et al. Factors asso⁃
                   egory 3⁃5 lisions[J]. Journal of Clinical Radiology,2025,  ciated with optimal follow⁃up in women with BI⁃RADS 3
                   44(12):2290-2294                                  breast findings[J]. J Am Coll Radiol,2020,17(4):469-
             [39]VAN RIEL S J,JACOBS C,SCHOLTEN E T,et al. Ob⁃       474
                   server variability for Lung ⁃ RADS categorisation of lung  [50]LIN X H,LIAO T T,YANG Y T,et al. Value of deep
                   cancer screening CTs:impact on patient management[J].  learning model for predicting breast imaging reporting
                   Eur Radiol,2019,29(2):924-931                     and data system 3 and 4A lesions on mammography[J].
             [40]BERG W A,CAMPASSI C,LANGENBERG P,et al.             Quant Imaging Med Surg,2025,15(5):4047-4058
                   Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System:inter⁃ and in⁃  [51]WU H C,LIU F,YANG Q S,et al. Automated MRI sys⁃
                   traobserver variability in feature analysis and final assess⁃  tem for clinically significant prostate cancer detection de⁃
                   ment[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2000,174(6):1769-    velopment validation and real⁃world implementation[J].
                   1777                                              Nat Commun,2025,16(1):11583
             [41]ALIKHASSI A,ESMAILI GOURABI H,BAIKPOUR M.      [52]XING Z Y,CHEN J,PAN L,et al. Enhanced detection of
                   Comparison of inter ⁃ and intra ⁃ observer variability of  prostate cancer lesions on biparametric MRI using artifi⁃
                   breast density assessments using the fourth and fifth edi⁃  cial intelligence:a multicenter,fully⁃crossed,multi⁃read⁃
                   tions of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System[J].  er multi⁃case trial[J]. Acad Radiol,2025,32(10):5954-
                   Eur J Radiol Open,2018,5:67-72                    5963
             [42]BECKER A S,BARTH B K,MARQUEZ P H,et al. In⁃    [53]CHEN H,YANG B W,QIAN L,et al. Deep learning pre⁃
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149