Page 128 - 南京医科大学学报自然科学版
P. 128

第43卷第9期
               ·1306 ·                           南 京    医 科 大 学 学         报                        2023年9月


                   333                                              (EBC)[J].Ann Oncol,2013,24(8):1986-1993
             [36] ULANER G A,JHAVERI K,CHANDARLAPATY S,et       [44] LEE S I,CATALANO O A,DEHDASHTI F. Evaluation of
                                                                                                 18
                                         18
                                                  18
                   al. Head⁃to⁃head evaluation of F⁃FES and F⁃FDG PET/  gynecologic cancer with MR imaging,F⁃FDG PET/CT,
                   CT in metastatic invasive lobular breast cancer[J]. J Nucl  and PET/MR imaging[J]. J Nucl Med,2015,56(3):436-
                   Med,2021,62(3):326-331                            443
             [37] VAN KRUCHTEN M,DE VRIES E F,ARTS H J,et al.   [45] GONG J,WANG N,BIAN L H,et al. Cervical cancer evalu⁃
                                                                                    18
                   Assessment of estrogen receptor expression in epithelial  ated with integrated F ⁃ FDG PET/MR[J]. Oncol Lett,
                                           18
                   ovarian cancer patients using 16α⁃ F⁃fluoro⁃17β⁃estradiol  2019,18(2):1815-1823
                   PET/CT[J]. J Nucl Med,2015,56(1):50-55       [46]SCHWARTZ M,GAVANE S C,BOU⁃AYACHE J,et al.
             [38] YAMADA S,TSUYOSHI H,YAMAMOTO M,et al. Prog⁃        Feasibility and diagnostic performance of hybrid PET/
                                 18
                   nostic value of 16α⁃ F⁃fluoro⁃17β⁃estradiol PET as a pre⁃  MRI compared with PET/CT for gynecological malignan⁃
                   dictor of disease outcome in endometrial cancer:a pro⁃  cies:a prospective pilot study[J]. Abdom Radiol,2018,
                   spective study[J]. J Nucl Med,2021,62(5):636-642  43(12):3462-3467
             [39] TSUJIKAWA T,YOSHIDA Y,KUDO T,et al. Functional  [47] BRENT R L. Saving lives and changing family histories:
                   images reflect aggressiveness of endometrial carcinoma:  appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and
                                                  18
                   estrogen receptor expression combined with F⁃FDG PET  women of reproductive age,concerning the risk of diagnos⁃
                  [J]. J Nucl Med,2009,50(10):1598-1604              tic radiation exposures during and before pregnancy[J].
             [40] GOUGELET A,MUELLER S O,KORACH K S,et al. Oes⁃      Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,200(1):4-24
                   trogen receptors pathways to oestrogen responsive ele⁃  [48] SELMAN T J,MANN C,ZAMORA J,et al. Diagnostic ac⁃
                   ments:the transactivation function⁃1 acts as the keystone  curacy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical
                   of oestrogen receptor(ER)beta ⁃ mediated transcriptional  cancer:a systematic review and meta⁃analysis[J]. CMAJ,
                   repression of ERalpha[J]. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol,  2008,178(7):855-862
                   2007,104(3/4/5):110-122                      [49] ISHIGURO T,NISHIKAWA N,ISHII S,et al. PET/MR
             [41] ANTUNES I F,VAN WAARDE A,DIERCKX R A,et al.        imaging for the evaluation of cervical cancer during preg⁃
                   Synthesis and evaluation of the estrogen receptor β⁃selec⁃  nancy[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2021,21(1):288
                                18
                                                                                                  18
                   tive radioligand 2⁃ F⁃fluoro⁃6⁃(6⁃hydroxynaphthalen⁃2⁃  [50] SPICK C,HERRMANN K,CZERNIN J. F⁃FDG PET/CT
                                               18
                   yl)pyridin⁃3⁃ol:comparison with 16α⁃ F⁃fluoro⁃17β⁃es⁃  and PET/MRI perform equally wellin cancer:evidence
                   tradiol[J]. J Nucl Med,2017,58(4):554-559         from studieson more than 2,300 patients[J]. J Nucl Med,
             [42] ANTUNES I F,WILLEMSEN A T M,SIJBESMA J W A,        2016,57(3):420-430
                   et al. In vivo quantification of ERβ expression by pharma⁃  [51] SAWICKI L M,KIRCHNER J,GRUENEISEN J,et al.
                                          18                                    18
                   cokinetic modeling:studies with F⁃FHNP PET[J]. J Nu⁃  Comparison of  F ⁃ FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone for
                   cl Med,2017,58(11):1743-1748                      whole ⁃ body staging and potential impact on therapeutic
             [43] YAN Y,LI X,BLANCHARD A,et al. Expression of both   management of women with suspected recurrent pelvic
                   estrogen receptor⁃beta 1(ER⁃β1)and its co⁃regulator ste⁃  cancer:a follow⁃up study[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag,
                   roid receptor RNA activator protein(SRAP)are predictive  2018,45(4):622-629
                   for benefit from tamoxifen therapy in patients with estro⁃             [收稿日期] 2023-05-17
                   gen receptor⁃alpha(ER⁃α)⁃negative early breast cancer                       (本文编辑:陈汐敏)
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133