Page 50 - 《南京医科大学学报》2026年第1期
P. 50
第46卷第1期
· 44 · 南 京 医 科 大 学 学 报 2026年1月
Conflict of Interests: intelligence in breast cancer:a systematic review on PET
All authors declare no conflict of interests. imaging clinical applications[J]. Curr Med Imaging,
作者贡献声明: 2023,19(8):832-843
卞雨蒙参与论文设计、论文撰写;丁紫藤和唐立钧参与 [10]WU S G,WANG J,LIAN C L,et al. Evaluation of the 8th
文章修改和润色;李天女负责选题、论文修改、经费支持。 edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s path⁃
Author’s Contributions: ological staging system in prognosis assessment and treat⁃
BIAN Yumeng was involved in research design and thesis ment decision making for stage T1⁃2N1 breast cancer af⁃
writing;DING Ziteng and TANG Lijun were involved in article ter mastectomy[J]. Breast,2020,51:2-10
revision and polishing;LI Tiannü was responsible for topic selec⁃ [11]SINGNURKAR A,POON R,METSER U. Head⁃to⁃head
tion,thesis revision,and financial support. comparison of the diagnostic performance of fdg pet/ct
[参考文献] and fdg pet/MRI in patients with cancer:a systematic re⁃
view and meta⁃analysis[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2024,
[1] BRAY F,LAVERSANNE M,SUNG H,et al. Global cancer
223(3):e2431519
statistics 2022:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and
[12]GRUENEISEN J,NAGARAJAH J,BUCHBENDER C,et
mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].
al. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance im⁃
CA A Cancer J Clin,2024,74(3):229-263
aging for local tumor staging in patients with primary
[2] IACOB R,IACOB E R,STOICESCU E R,et al. Evaluat⁃
breast cancer:a comparison with positron emission tomog⁃
ing the role of breast ultrasound in early detection of
raphy/computed tomography and magnetic resonance im⁃
breast cancer in low⁃ and middle⁃income countries:a com⁃
aging[J]. Invest Radiol,2015,50(8):505-513
prehensive narrative review[J]. Bioengineering,2024,11
[13]BOTSIKAS D,KALOVIDOURI A,BECKER M,et al.
(3):262
Clinical utility of 18 F ⁃ FDG ⁃ PET/MR for preoperative
[3] FOWLER A M,STRIGEL R M. Clinical advances in PET⁃
breast cancer staging[J]. Eur Radiol,2016,26(7):2297-
MRI for breast cancer[J]. Lancet Oncol,2022,23(1):
2307
e32-e43
[14]TO B,ISAAC D,ANDRECHEK E R. Studying lymphatic
[4] ABU ABEELH E,ABUABEILEH Z. Comparative effec⁃
metastasis in breast cancer:current models,strategies,
tiveness of mammography,ultrasound,and MRI in the de⁃
and clinical perspectives[J]. J Mammary Gland Biol Neo⁃
tection of breast carcinoma in dense breast tissue:a sys⁃
plasia,2020,25(3):191-203
tematic review[J]. Cureus,2024,16(4):e59054
[15]MORAWITZ J,BRUCKMANN N M,DIETZEL F,et al.
[5] SASAKI M,TOZAKI M,KUBOTA K,et al. Simultaneous
Comparison of nodal staging between CT,MRI,and[18F]⁃
18
whole⁃body and breast F⁃FDG PET/MRI examinations
FDG PET/MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast
in patients with breast cancer:a comparison of apparent
cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag,2022,49(3):992-
diffusion coefficients and maximum standardized uptake
1001
values[J]. Jpn J Radiol,2018,36(2):122-133
[16]BRUCKMANN N M,KIRCHNER J,MORAWITZ J,et al.
[6] LEITHNER D,HORVAT J V,BERNARD⁃DAVILA B,et
18
Prospective comparison of CT and F⁃FDG PET/MRI in
al. A multiparametric[(18)F]FDG PET/MRI diagnostic
N and M staging of primary breast cancer patients:initial
model including imaging biomarkers of the tumor and con⁃
results[J]. PLoS One,2021,16(12):e0260804
tralateral healthy breast tissue aids breast cancer diagno⁃
[17]HAN S C,HUANG Y J. Comparison of the performance of
sis[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2019,46(9):1878-
[(18)f]⁃fdg pet/ct and[(18)f]⁃fdg pet/MRI for lymph
1888
node metastasis in breast cancer:a systematic review and
[7] ROMEO V,CLAUSER P,RASUL S,et al. AI⁃enhanced
meta⁃analysis[J]. Curr Med Imaging,2024,20:e1573405
18
simultaneous multiparametric F⁃FDG PET/MRI for accu⁃
6304849
rate breast cancer diagnosis[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol
[18]DE MOOIJ C M,SUNEN I,MITEA C,et al. Diagnostic
Imag,2022,49(2):596-608
performance of PET/computed tomography versus PET/
[8] ZHU H L,DOGAN B E. American joint committee on can⁃
MRI and diffusion⁃weighted imaging in the N⁃ and M⁃stag⁃
cer’s staging system for breast cancer,eighth edition:
ing of breast cancer patients[J]. Nucl Med Commun,
summary for clinicians[J]. Eur J Breast Health,2021,17
2020,41(10):995-1004
(3):234-238
[19]XIA L J,LAI J Q,HUANG D,et al. Comparing the diag⁃
[9] ALONGI P,ROVERA G,STRACUZZI F,et al. Artificial
nostic efficacy of[(18)f]fdg pet/ct and[(18)f]fdg pet/

