Page 50 - 《南京医科大学学报》2026年第1期
P. 50

第46卷第1期
              · 44   ·                           南 京    医 科 大 学 学         报                        2026年1月


                  Conflict of Interests:                             intelligence in breast cancer:a systematic review on PET
                  All authors declare no conflict of interests.      imaging clinical applications[J]. Curr Med Imaging,
                  作者贡献声明:                                            2023,19(8):832-843
                  卞雨蒙参与论文设计、论文撰写;丁紫藤和唐立钧参与                      [10]WU S G,WANG J,LIAN C L,et al. Evaluation of the 8th
              文章修改和润色;李天女负责选题、论文修改、经费支持。                             edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s path⁃
                  Author’s Contributions:                            ological staging system in prognosis assessment and treat⁃
                  BIAN Yumeng was involved in research design and thesis  ment decision making for stage T1⁃2N1 breast cancer af⁃
              writing;DING Ziteng and TANG Lijun were involved in article  ter mastectomy[J]. Breast,2020,51:2-10
              revision and polishing;LI Tiannü was responsible for topic selec⁃  [11]SINGNURKAR A,POON R,METSER U. Head⁃to⁃head
              tion,thesis revision,and financial support.            comparison of the diagnostic performance of fdg pet/ct
             [参考文献]                                                  and fdg pet/MRI in patients with cancer:a systematic re⁃
                                                                     view and meta⁃analysis[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2024,
             [1] BRAY F,LAVERSANNE M,SUNG H,et al. Global cancer
                                                                     223(3):e2431519
                   statistics 2022:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and
                                                                [12]GRUENEISEN J,NAGARAJAH J,BUCHBENDER C,et
                   mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].
                                                                     al. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance im⁃
                   CA A Cancer J Clin,2024,74(3):229-263
                                                                     aging for local tumor staging in patients with primary
             [2] IACOB R,IACOB E R,STOICESCU E R,et al. Evaluat⁃
                                                                     breast cancer:a comparison with positron emission tomog⁃
                   ing the role of breast ultrasound in early detection of
                                                                     raphy/computed tomography and magnetic resonance im⁃
                   breast cancer in low⁃ and middle⁃income countries:a com⁃
                                                                     aging[J]. Invest Radiol,2015,50(8):505-513
                   prehensive narrative review[J]. Bioengineering,2024,11
                                                                [13]BOTSIKAS D,KALOVIDOURI A,BECKER M,et al.
                  (3):262
                                                                     Clinical utility of  18 F ⁃ FDG ⁃ PET/MR for preoperative
             [3] FOWLER A M,STRIGEL R M. Clinical advances in PET⁃
                                                                     breast cancer staging[J]. Eur Radiol,2016,26(7):2297-
                   MRI for breast cancer[J]. Lancet Oncol,2022,23(1):
                                                                     2307
                   e32-e43
                                                                [14]TO B,ISAAC D,ANDRECHEK E R. Studying lymphatic
             [4] ABU ABEELH E,ABUABEILEH Z. Comparative effec⁃
                                                                     metastasis in breast cancer:current models,strategies,
                   tiveness of mammography,ultrasound,and MRI in the de⁃
                                                                     and clinical perspectives[J]. J Mammary Gland Biol Neo⁃
                   tection of breast carcinoma in dense breast tissue:a sys⁃
                                                                     plasia,2020,25(3):191-203
                   tematic review[J]. Cureus,2024,16(4):e59054
                                                                [15]MORAWITZ J,BRUCKMANN N M,DIETZEL F,et al.
             [5] SASAKI M,TOZAKI M,KUBOTA K,et al. Simultaneous
                                                                     Comparison of nodal staging between CT,MRI,and[18F]⁃
                                    18
                   whole⁃body and breast F⁃FDG PET/MRI examinations
                                                                     FDG PET/MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast
                   in patients with breast cancer:a comparison of apparent
                                                                     cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag,2022,49(3):992-
                   diffusion coefficients and maximum standardized uptake
                                                                     1001
                   values[J]. Jpn J Radiol,2018,36(2):122-133
                                                                [16]BRUCKMANN N M,KIRCHNER J,MORAWITZ J,et al.
             [6] LEITHNER D,HORVAT J V,BERNARD⁃DAVILA B,et
                                                                                               18
                                                                     Prospective comparison of CT and F⁃FDG PET/MRI in
                   al. A multiparametric[(18)F]FDG PET/MRI diagnostic
                                                                     N and M staging of primary breast cancer patients:initial
                   model including imaging biomarkers of the tumor and con⁃
                                                                     results[J]. PLoS One,2021,16(12):e0260804
                   tralateral healthy breast tissue aids breast cancer diagno⁃
                                                                [17]HAN S C,HUANG Y J. Comparison of the performance of
                   sis[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2019,46(9):1878-
                                                                    [(18)f]⁃fdg pet/ct and[(18)f]⁃fdg pet/MRI for lymph
                   1888
                                                                     node metastasis in breast cancer:a systematic review and
             [7] ROMEO V,CLAUSER P,RASUL S,et al. AI⁃enhanced
                                                                     meta⁃analysis[J]. Curr Med Imaging,2024,20:e1573405
                                        18
                   simultaneous multiparametric F⁃FDG PET/MRI for accu⁃
                                                                     6304849
                   rate breast cancer diagnosis[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol
                                                                [18]DE MOOIJ C M,SUNEN I,MITEA C,et al. Diagnostic
                   Imag,2022,49(2):596-608
                                                                     performance of PET/computed tomography versus PET/
             [8] ZHU H L,DOGAN B E. American joint committee on can⁃
                                                                     MRI and diffusion⁃weighted imaging in the N⁃ and M⁃stag⁃
                   cer’s staging system for breast cancer,eighth edition:
                                                                     ing of breast cancer patients[J]. Nucl Med Commun,
                   summary for clinicians[J]. Eur J Breast Health,2021,17
                                                                     2020,41(10):995-1004
                  (3):234-238
                                                                [19]XIA L J,LAI J Q,HUANG D,et al. Comparing the diag⁃
             [9] ALONGI P,ROVERA G,STRACUZZI F,et al. Artificial
                                                                     nostic efficacy of[(18)f]fdg pet/ct and[(18)f]fdg pet/
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55