Page 90 - 南京医科大学社科版

南京医科大学学报（社会科学版）京医科大学学报（社会科学版） 第4期 总第135期
南
· 420 ·
Journal of Nanjing Medical University（Social Sciences）of Nanjing Medical University（Social Sciences） 2026年8月
Journal
可读性计量分析［J］. 现代情报，2024，44（3）：140-151 vascular Surg，2020，54（2）：111-117
［35］Arora A，Lam A S，Karami Z，et al. How readable are ［38］Xu D，Pan J，Dai X C，et al. Comparing quality of prima⁃
Australian paediatric oral health education materials? ry healthcare between public and private providers in
［J］. BMC Oral Health，2014，14：111 China：study protocol of a cross⁃sectional study using un⁃
［36］Doak C C，Doak L G，Root J H. Teaching Patients with announced standardised patients in seven provinces of
Low Literacy Skills［M］. 2nd ed. Philadelphia：J.B.Lip⁃ China［J］. BMJ Open，2021，11（1）：e040792
pincott Company，1996：49-59 ［39］ 熊婷，胡丹，陈家应. 我国公立医院改革进展、问题及
［37］Scott B B，Johnson A R，Doval A F，et al. Readability 对策浅析［J］. 南京医科大学学报（社会科学版），2018，
and understandability analysis of online materials relat⁃ 18（3）：215-219
ed to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair［J］. Vasc Endo⁃ （本文编辑：姜 鑫）

Evaluation of the access⁃understanding⁃application effectiveness of

hospital oral health education materials

1，2 3 4 5
Chu Yili ，Yang Shunli ，Wang Yan ，Long Ziyi
1. College of Innovation and Entrepreneurship，2. Key Laboratory of Public Health Social Governance，Philosophy，and Social
Sciences of Anhui Province，3. School of Humanistic Medicine，4. Institute of Documentation and Information，Anhui Medical
University，Hefei 230032；5. First Clinical Medical College，Shandong University，Jinan 250012，China
Abstract：This study collected a total of 161 printable oral health education materials from multiple
hospitals in Hefei， Anhui Province. DISCERN， a Chinese readability model and the Patient Education
Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials（PEMAT⁃P），were used to assess the overall quality，readability，

understandability，and actionability of these materials. Differences and similarities of health education materials
between public and private hospitals were also compared. Based on mean scores，the overall quality of hospital
oral health education materials was moderate，with a language difficulty equivalent to approximately the first
year of junior high school. The scores of understandability and actionability were both below the recommended
threshold. Compared across different hospital types，materials from private hospitals scored slightly higher
overall and demonstrated better readability and user orientation，whereas materials from public hospitals
performed better in terms of content objectivity and balance of information.
Key words：health education；oral health education materials；information quality；dental hospital