Page 40 - 南京医科大学学报社会科学版
P. 40

南
                                                  南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)京医科大学学报(社会科学版)                  第4期 总第111期
             · 350  ·                       Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)  2022年8月
                                            Journal
             产总值而言,各地应集中精力发展经济,注重发挥                                 卫生资源配置效率分析[J]. 卫生软科学,2021,35(3):
             地域优势,提升经济发展质量,注重可持续发展,促                                57-61
             进经济发展和卫生资源配置的协调统一。就各地                             [6] CHARNES A,COOPER W,RHODES E. Measuring the
             区常住人口而言,首先要结合本地人口特征、人群                                 efficiency of decision making units[J]. Eur J Oper,1978,
             健康状态等情况,因地制宜,实现合理配置卫生资                                 2(6):429-444
             源,满足不同卫生服务需求的目标;其次要充分考                            [7] 陈巍巍,张雷,马铁虎,等. 关于三阶段 DEA 模型的几
             虑地区人口增长、人口流动的未来趋势,制定科学                                 点研究[J]. 系统工程,2014,32(9):144-149
             的卫生资源配置模型,避免由人口增长、流动引起                            [8] 张雨薇,高红,霍佳震. 上海三甲医院绩效研究分析
             的资源竞争或内需不足等现象。就城市化率而言,                                 ——基于三阶段超效率SBM模型[J]. 上海管理科学,
             要推进紧密型“医联体”建设,提升卫生资源供给效                                2019,41(6):96-102
                                                               [9] 颜晓畅. 政府投入与不同地区医疗卫生机构静态和动
             率。一是建立不同层级医院权责清单,确定不同层
             级医院的职能定位,改革医疗机构的利益分配机                                  态运营效率——基于 DEA⁃Tobit 方法的实证研究[J].
                                                                    南开经济研究,2018(6):93-111
             制,使其回归本位;二是加大基层资金投入,通过开
                                                               [10] 续晓方,李文瑾,唐立岷,等. 我国卫生资源配置效率
             展医师多点执业,基层卫生人才培训进修、定点帮
                                                                    研究——基于三阶段 DEA 模型[J]. 卫生经济研究,
             扶等手段,为基层输送更多优质医疗卫生资源,提
                                                                    2021,38(6):23-27
             升居民基层就医满意度。
                                                               [11] 刘海英,张纯洪.中国城乡地区医疗卫生系统服务效率
             参考文献                                                   的对比研究[J].中国软科学,2011(10):102-112
                                                               [12] 郜佳,刘军,田美蓉,等. 基于 Bootstrap⁃Malmquist 指数
             [1] 王俊豪,贾婉文. 中国医疗卫生资源配置与利用效率
                                                                    模型的我国基层医疗卫生机构投入产出效率评价[J].
                  分析[J]. 财贸经济,2021,42(2):20-35
                                                                    医学与社会,2021,34(11):59-63
             [2] 徐俐颖,乔晗,赵思琦,等. 长江经济带医疗卫生资源
                                                               [13] 陈洁,曹阳. 基于供给侧视角下我国区域卫生资源配置
                  配置效率动态评价[J]. 医学与社会,2020,33(9):1-4
                                                                    效率研究[J]. 卫生软科学,2018,32(11):35-40
             [3] 项盈如,吴进,王聪,等. 医改前后我国省域卫生资源                     [14] 曹阳,闫岩. 健康公平视角下江苏省卫生资源配置效
                  配置效率评价——基于 DEA 及 Tobit 方法[J]. 卫生软                 率研究[J]. 卫生经济研究,2016(12):18-21
                  科学,2020,34(9):71-75                          [15]陶洲,蔡子汉,刘海波,等. 基于三阶段数据包络分析模
             [4] 巴桑吉巴,马爽. 基于 DEA 的西藏地区卫生资源配置                        型的成渝经济圈医院运行效率研究[J]. 现代预防医

                  效率纵向分析[J]. 卫生软科学,2021,35(2):59-61                 学,2021,48(20):3760-3763
             [5] 郑存财,张雯,温细妹,等. 基于 DEA 的全国基层医疗                                                (本文编辑:姜       鑫)
              Efficiency analysis of medical and health resource allocation in China
                                based on three⁃stage SBM⁃Malmquist model


                                                 YE Yizhong,TAO Qunshan
                        School of Economics and Management,Anhui University of Chinese Medicine,Hefei 230012,China
                 Abstract:Based on the three⁃stage SBM model and the Malmquist index method,the article conducted
             static and dynamic evaluation of the allocation efficiency of medical and health resources in 31 provinces and
             cities (excluding Hong Kong,Macao and Taiwan regions) in China from 2015 to 2020. The results showed that
             after eliminating environmental factors and random errors,the average comprehensive efficiency of health
             resource allocation in China from 2015 to 2020 was 0.720,and the average total factor productivity was 0.937.
             Among them,the technological progress index decreased by 5.4%,the pure technical efficiency change index
             decreased by 0.7%,and the scale efficiency change index decreased by 0.3%. From 2015 to 2020,the overall
             efficiency of health resource allocation in China is low and on a downward trend,with obvious constraints on
             technological progress. There are large differences in the allocation efficiency between regions and provinces;

             regional gross domestic product,resident population and urbanization levels have a significant impact on
             allocation efficiency. It is suggested to improve efficiency based on appropriate development scale and driven by
             technological progress;focusing on regional coordination,enhancing the balance,fairness and accuracy of
             health resource input;and using the improvement of the external environment as a breakthrough,to improve
             the health service system.
                 Key words:health resource;allocation efficiency;three⁃stage SBM model;Malmquist index
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45