Page 57 - 南京医科大学社科版
P. 57

第6期 总第125期                           南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)京医科大学学报(社会科学版)                             ·
                                                    南
                 2024年12月                     Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)  · 597
                                              Journal
                    2013:136                                          16-23
              [21]General Assembly of the World Medical Association.  [26]李骥,李义庭. 我国人体器官移植伦理原则建设初探
                    World medical association declaration of Helsinki:ethi⁃  [J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版),2011,5(2):91-94
                    cal principles for medical research involving human sub⁃  [27]范瑞平. 当代儒家生命伦理学[M]. 北京:北京大学出
                    jects[J]. J Am Coll Dent,2014,81(3):14-18         版社,2011:43
              [22]江行配,田海,孙露,等. 异种心脏移植的研究进展[J].                  [28]王明旭,范瑞平. 器官捐献与分配:为中国的家庭优先原
                    器官移植,2019,10(5):599-602                           则辩护[J]. 中国医学伦理学,2017,30(10):1187-1191
              [23]孙慕义. 后现代生命伦理学——关于敬畏生命的意志以                     [29]赵静,王雪静,熊亚晴. 老年患者临床诊疗中近亲属参
                    及生命科学之善与恶的价值图式:生命伦理学的新原                           与决策的伦理问题[J]. 南京医科大学学报(社会科学
                    道、新原法与新原实[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,                       版),2020,20(3):237-240
                    2015:512                                    [30]VANDERPOOL H Y. The international xenotransplanta⁃
              [24]王晓东,刘松. 人类生存关系的诗意反思——论马丁·                           tion association consensus statement on conditions for
                    布伯的“我—你”哲学对近代主体哲学的批判[J]. 求                        undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in
                    是学刊,2002,29(4):38-42                              type 1 diabetes—chapter 7:informed consent and xeno⁃
              [25]孙慕义. 通往大同:普遍观念与普全的社会理想——庚                           transplantation clinical trials[J]. Xenotransplantation,
                    子灾疫的忧与思:身体政治观念的力量与历史意义                            2009,16(4):255-262
                   [J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,22(6):                                            (本文编辑:姜 鑫)






                   Informed consent for xenotransplantation from the perspective of
                                                    relational ethics


                                                            MA Jing
                            School of Medical Humanism,Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210023,China
                   Abstract:The principlism of informed consent emphasizes“rational egoism”and“justified action”. The
              “rational egoism”,where the doctor and the patient exist as separate individuals,leads to the disconnection of
               the doctor⁃patient relationship. “Justified action”makes people rely on external rules,leading to a weakening
               sense of internal responsibility. This paper attempts to address the limitation of the principlism of informed
               consent through Martin Buber’s relational ethics. Martin Buber distinguishes between“I⁃It”and“I⁃Thou”,
               emphasizing the importance of the dialogical communication between people. From the perspective of Martin
               Buber’s relational ethics, this paper discusses three specific ethical challenges of informed consent in
               xenotransplantation in terms of capacity,information,and decision ⁃ making factors. With the uncertainty of
               xenotransplantation,this paper proposes that informed consent should operate on the interplay between“I ⁃
               Thou”and“I⁃It”,with the relationship of“I⁃Thou”as the core to foster a sense of positive responsibility
               toward others.
                   Key words:xenotransplantation;informed consent;relational ethics
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62